Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether a person who has not himself signed or made any mark on a will can be treated as an attesting witness when another person, on his authority or direction, signs or makes a mark or writes his name on his behalf, and whether the will was proved in accordance with law.
Analysis: Section 63 of the Indian Succession Act requires the testator to sign or affix his mark, or have it signed by another person in his presence and by his direction, but it separately requires each attesting witness to sign the will in the presence of the testator. The provision makes a clear distinction between execution by the testator and attestation by witnesses. The enabling language that permits signature by another person for the testator is absent for attesting witnesses. Applying that statutory scheme, a witness cannot delegate the act of attestation to another person, and there must be physical contact between the witness and the signature or mark appearing on the document. Section 68 of the Indian Evidence Act requires proof of execution through at least one attesting witness, and in the absence of a valid attesting witness the will cannot be proved.
Conclusion: A person who has not himself signed or affixed his mark cannot be treated as an attesting witness merely because another person signed for him. The will was not proved as required by law, and the appeal failed.
Ratio Decidendi: For valid attestation of a will, an attesting witness must himself sign or affix his mark; signature by another person on his behalf does not satisfy Section 63 of the Indian Succession Act.