TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Roles & Powers of Magistrates and Session Judges in Criminal Proceedings clarified</h1> <h3>Dharam Pal and Ors. Versus State of Haryana and Ors.</h3> Dharam Pal and Ors. Versus State of Haryana and Ors. - (2014) 3 SCC 306 Issues Involved:1. Role of the Committing Magistrate after committing the case to the Court of Session.2. Jurisdiction of the Magistrate to issue summons against persons mentioned in column 2 of the police report.3. Procedure to be followed by the Magistrate when issuing summons.4. Powers of the Session Judge to issue summons under Section 193 CrPC.5. Timing for the Session Judge to issue summons under Section 193 CrPC.6. Validity of the decision in Ranjit Singh's case versus Kishun Singh's case.Detailed Analysis:1. Role of the Committing Magistrate:The Court examined whether the Magistrate had any role after committing the case to the Court of Session. It was concluded that the Magistrate has a significant role in committing the case. The Magistrate can disagree with the police report and issue process or summons against the accused if convinced of a prima facie case. This role is essential to avoid duplication and prolongation of trials.2. Jurisdiction to Issue Summons:The Court held that the Magistrate has the power to issue summons against persons mentioned in column 2 of the police report. This is permissible if the Magistrate disagrees with the police report and believes a prima facie case exists. The Magistrate can act on a protest petition or independently issue summons, ensuring the case is properly tried.3. Procedure for Issuing Summons:The Court clarified that if the Magistrate decides to issue summons, it should be based on the police report itself. The Magistrate can either inquire into the matter or commit it to the Court of Session if the case is triable by the Session Court. This ensures that the process is streamlined and adheres to the procedural requirements.4. Powers of the Session Judge:The Court affirmed that the Session Judge has the authority to issue summons under Section 193 CrPC upon receiving the case from the Magistrate. Section 193 allows the Session Court to take cognizance of offences as a Court of original jurisdiction once the case is committed to it by a Magistrate.5. Timing for Issuing Summons:The Court ruled that the Session Judge does not need to wait until the stage under Section 319 CrPC to issue summons. Upon committal under Section 209, the Session Judge can summon those shown in column 2 of the police report to stand trial along with the accused already named. This avoids unnecessary delays and ensures a comprehensive trial.6. Validity of Ranjit Singh's Case:The Court concluded that the decision in Kishun Singh's case was correct, and the Session Judge could issue summons under Section 193 CrPC based on the records transmitted by the Magistrate. The decision in Ranjit Singh's case, which suggested otherwise, was not upheld. The Court emphasized that the Session Court has jurisdiction to take cognizance of offences and summon additional accused upon committal.Conclusion:The judgment clarified the roles and powers of the Magistrate and Session Judge in criminal proceedings. The Magistrate can issue summons against additional accused before committing the case to the Court of Session, and the Session Judge can take cognizance and issue summons upon committal. The decision in Kishun Singh's case was upheld as the correct interpretation of the law. The matter was remitted to the Three-Judge Bench to dispose of the pending Criminal Appeals accordingly.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
