Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI OCR

Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        2005 (1) TMI 746 - SC - Indian Laws

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Hazardous waste law prevails over Basel thresholds, with PCB-contaminated imports ordered incinerated at the importers' cost. Imported waste oil containing detectable PCB levels was held to constitute hazardous waste under Indian environmental law, and the Basel Convention ...
                      Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                          Hazardous waste law prevails over Basel thresholds, with PCB-contaminated imports ordered incinerated at the importers' cost.

                          Imported waste oil containing detectable PCB levels was held to constitute hazardous waste under Indian environmental law, and the Basel Convention threshold was treated only as guidance, not as overriding stricter domestic standards. The Court accepted that the consignments had deteriorated and that safe re-refining or re-export was not practical, so hazardous consignments were ordered to be destroyed by supervised incineration, with a limited recycling option left open only for the one consignment found fit for that purpose. Applying the precautionary principle and the polluter pays principle, the Court held the importers liable for the costs of testing, transport and destruction.




                          Issues: (i) whether the imported waste oil containing detectable PCB levels could be treated as hazardous waste under Indian law notwithstanding the Basel Convention parameters; (ii) whether the consignments should be destroyed by incineration, or any of them recycled or re-exported; (iii) whether the importers were liable to bear the costs of testing and disposal under the precautionary principle and the polluter pays principle.

                          Issue (i): whether the imported waste oil containing detectable PCB levels could be treated as hazardous waste under Indian law notwithstanding the Basel Convention parameters.

                          Analysis: The national regulatory framework governing hazardous waste was treated as controlling. The presence of PCB in waste mineral oil was taken to render the material hazardous under the domestic rules, and the Court held that the Basel Convention served as guidance but could not override stricter domestic standards. The permissible concentration under the Convention was therefore not decisive where Indian law prescribed a stricter threshold and prohibited imports with detectable PCB content.

                          Conclusion: The imported consignments were hazardous waste under Indian law.

                          Issue (ii): whether the consignments should be destroyed by incineration, or any of them recycled or re-exported.

                          Analysis: The Court accepted the expert assessment that the consignments had deteriorated during prolonged storage, that adequate facilities were not available for safe re-refining of PCB-containing oil, and that re-export was not a practical or appropriate remedy after the passage of time. On the material before it, the Court agreed that incineration was the appropriate environmental response for the hazardous consignments, while permitting only the separately identified consignment found fit for recycling to be considered for that limited course under supervision.

                          Conclusion: The hazardous consignments were directed to be destroyed by incineration, with a limited recycling option left open only for the consignment found fit for that purpose.

                          Issue (iii): whether the importers were liable to bear the costs of testing and disposal under the precautionary principle and the polluter pays principle.

                          Analysis: The Court reiterated that the precautionary principle and the polluter pays principle form part of Indian environmental law. Where hazardous waste had been illegally imported and testing and destruction were necessary to prevent environmental harm, the cost burden was to fall on the wrongdoers. The Court treated the expenditure for laboratory testing, transport, and incineration as recoverable from the importers.

                          Conclusion: The importers were held liable to bear the costs of testing and destruction.

                          Final Conclusion: The Court upheld the expert recommendations in substance, prioritised environmental protection over reliance on the Basel Convention's lower threshold, and ordered disposal of the hazardous consignments by supervised incineration, subject to the limited recycling direction for the one consignment found fit for that course.

                          Ratio Decidendi: Where imported waste constitutes hazardous waste under domestic environmental law, stricter national standards prevail over international guideline thresholds, and the hazardous consignments may be directed to be destroyed at the importer's cost by applying the precautionary principle and the polluter pays principle.


                          Full Summary is available for active users!
                          Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                          Topics

                          ActsIncome Tax
                          No Records Found