Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:
TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
By Case ID:

When case Id is present, search is done only for this

Sort By:
RelevanceDefaultDate
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        <h1>Tribunal's Direction on Taxing Non-Resident Income: Clarification on Mandatory Requirement</h1> <h3>M/s. Madhucon Sino Hydro (JV) Versus ACIT, Central Circle-4 Hyderabad</h3> The Tribunal clarified that its direction to the Assessing Officer regarding taxing the income of the non-resident constituent was not mandatory but ... Rectification u/s 254 - ITAT held that the assessee being an AOP is not required to deduct tax at source for making payment to its constituent companies - HELD THAT:- Tribunal has given a finding that the assessee, being an AOP/JV, is not required to deduct tax at source from the payments to the constituents towards their share of work carried out by them. Tribunal thought it fit to direct the A.O. to verify whether Chinese concern has offered its income to tax in India and has also directed the A.O. to bring the same to tax in India if it is found that the non-resident has not offered this amount as part of their taxable income in India. We find that the above observation or direction is only means that the A.O. may take suitable action for bringing the amount to tax in accordance with the provisions of the Act. Whether it is only an observation or a direction, in our opinion, to take a suitable action, A.O. has to follow the relevant provision of law. It is a settled position that before bringing to tax any income of a non-resident, the A.O. has to examine as to whether such income is taxable in India. The conditions precedent for bringing to tax such amount have to be satisfied before the A.O. can take recourse to bringing the same to tax in India in the hands of the assessee. Therefore, in our opinion, there is no mistake committed by the Tribunal in giving such observation/direction but in our opinion, it would be in the fitness of the case and justice if the following the words are added at the end of para-12 : “Only if the said income is chargeable to tax in India”. M.As. of the assessee are partly allowed. Issues:Rectification/modification of Tribunal's order under section 254(2) of the I.T. Act, 1961 regarding liability to make TDS for payments to constituent companies.Analysis:The assessee, a Joint Venture (JV) formed by two constituents, sought rectification/modification of the Tribunal's order regarding TDS liability for payments to its constituents. The Tribunal had held that the assessee, as an AOP, was not required to deduct tax at source for payments to its constituents. However, the Tribunal directed the Assessing Officer (A.O.) to verify if the Chinese constituent had offered its income for tax in India and to bring it to tax if not. The assessee contended that these were considered directions to the A.O., leading to reopening of assessments. The Tribunal clarified that such direction was not mandatory but meant that A.O. may take suitable action after verifying taxability in India. It emphasized that A.O. must ensure the income is taxable in India before bringing it to tax in the hands of the assessee.The Tribunal acknowledged the assessee's plea for modification but clarified that the direction to A.O. was not an error. It proposed adding a condition that the income should be chargeable to tax in India before bringing it to tax. This condition aimed to ensure compliance with relevant provisions of law before taxing non-resident income. The Tribunal partially allowed the assessee's miscellaneous applications, emphasizing the importance of verifying taxability in India before taxing the income of non-residents through suitable actions by the A.O.In conclusion, the Tribunal clarified that its direction to the A.O. regarding taxing the income of the non-resident constituent was not mandatory but contingent upon the income being chargeable to tax in India. This condition was proposed to ensure compliance with relevant provisions of the I.T. Act, emphasizing the need for the A.O. to verify taxability before bringing such income to tax. The Tribunal's decision highlighted the importance of following due process and ensuring tax liability only if the income meets the conditions for taxation in India.

        Topics

        ActsIncome Tax
        No Records Found