Just a moment...

Top
FeedbackReport
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Feedback/Report an Error
Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:
TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
By Case ID:

When case Id is present, search is done only for this

Sort By: ?
Even if Sort by Date is selected, exact match will be shown on the top.
RelevanceDate
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        Note

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        <h1>Approval of Resolution Plan under IBC with CoC support; Withdrawal denied, Rs. 50,000 penalty.</h1> <h3>Kotak Mahindra Bank Limited, And Seroco Lighting Industries Pvt Ltd Versus Ravi Kapoor RP for Arya Filaments Pvt Ltd & Ors</h3> Kotak Mahindra Bank Limited, And Seroco Lighting Industries Pvt Ltd Versus Ravi Kapoor RP for Arya Filaments Pvt Ltd & Ors - TMI Issues Involved:1. Approval of the Resolution Plan under Section 31 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC), 2016.2. Consideration of reliefs and concessions sought by the Resolution Applicants.3. Withdrawal of the Resolution Plan under Section 60(5) of the IBC, 2016.Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:1. Approval of the Resolution Plan under Section 31 of the IBC, 2016:The application was filed under Section 30(6) of the IBC, 2016, seeking approval of the Resolution Plan submitted by the Resolution Applicants. The Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) was initiated on 17.08.2018, and the Interim Resolution Professional (IRP) was appointed. The Committee of Creditors (CoC) approved the revised Resolution Plan in its 5th meeting on 10.05.2019 with 100% voting. The Resolution Plan was found to comply with the requirements under Regulation 38 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India (Insolvency Resolution Process for Corporate Persons) Regulations, 2016, and Section 30 of the IBC. The Tribunal noted that the Resolution Applicant had considered the interests of all stakeholders and prioritized the clearance of dues. The total amount proposed for the Resolution Plan costs was Rs. 6,79,22,000/-.2. Consideration of reliefs and concessions sought by the Resolution Applicants:The Tribunal observed that not allowing Clause 19(xv) (reliefs and concessions sought by the Resolution Applicants) would not hinder the implementation of the Resolution Plan. The Resolution Applicants were directed to approach competent authorities for any concessions or reliefs required. The Tribunal emphasized that the approval of the Resolution Plan does not imply automatic waiver or abetment of pending legal proceedings. The Resolution Applicants were advised to seek appropriate reliefs from relevant authorities.3. Withdrawal of the Resolution Plan under Section 60(5) of the IBC, 2016:The application for withdrawal of the Resolution Plan was filed under Section 60(5) of the IBC, 2016, citing outdated financial information and the impact of COVID-19. The Tribunal found the applicant's claim of unawareness of the financial condition unconvincing, as the Corporate Debtor was an MSME, and the plan was prepared considering its financial state. Citing the judgment in Kundan Care Products Ltd vs. Mr. Amit Gupta Resolution Professional and Ors, the Tribunal noted that there is no provision in the IBC allowing withdrawal of an approved Resolution Plan. Additionally, the application lacked clarity regarding the relief sought, leading to its dismissal with a cost of Rs. 50,000/- to be paid to the PM CARES Fund.Conclusion:The Tribunal approved the Resolution Plan under Section 31 of the IBC, 2016, noting compliance with relevant regulations and the CoC's unanimous approval. Reliefs and concessions sought by the Resolution Applicants were directed to be pursued with competent authorities. The application for withdrawal of the Resolution Plan was dismissed due to lack of clarity and legal provisions supporting such withdrawal.

        Topics

        ActsIncome Tax
        No Records Found