Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the proviso to Section 11(1A) of the All India Institute of Medical Sciences (Amendment) Act, 2007, which brought about premature termination of the incumbent Director and limited compensation, was violative of Article 14 and liable to be struck down.
Analysis: The proviso singled out the then existing Director for immediate cessation of office, while future Directors would continue to be governed by the general tenure provision. The Court treated the appointment as a tenure post and held that curtailment of such tenure could validly occur only for justifiable reasons and in conformity with the principles of natural justice. The impugned proviso did not create a rational class based on any intelligible differentia, but operated as a one-man measure directed at a named incumbent in substance, thereby amounting to naked discrimination. The Court further held that the amendment could not be treated as a valid general policy or a mere alteration of service conditions.
Conclusion: The proviso was held to be ultra vires and unconstitutional for violating Article 14, and it was struck down. The writ petition was allowed and the petitioner was entitled to restoration in office and consequential benefits till completion of his tenure.