Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the Revenue's appeal was maintainable in view of the low tax effect circulars issued by the CBDT and whether the cited exceptions applied to the case.
Analysis: The tax effect in dispute was below the prescribed monetary limit for appeals before the Tribunal. The case was held not to fall within the exceptions under the relevant CBDT circular on low tax effect. The later circular dealing with bogus long-term capital gains and short-term capital loss through penny stocks was found inapplicable to accommodation unsecured loans. The monetary limits prescribed by the CBDT were held applicable to pending appeals as well.
Conclusion: The Revenue's appeal was not maintainable and was dismissed.
Ratio Decidendi: An appeal below the CBDT-prescribed monetary limit is not maintainable unless it falls within a recognised exception under the applicable circular.