1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule — now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available
2. New: “In Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws →
TaxTMI Login
🚀 New: Section-Wise Filter ✕
Just a moment...
1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule — now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available
2. New: “In Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws →
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
<h1>Tribunal Grants Extension of Stay for Assessee in Tax Appeal Case</h1> The Tribunal granted an extension of stay for the assessment year 2011-12, originally permitted by the Tribunal. The Assessee's request for an extension ... Extension of the stay originally granted - HELD THAT:- The Hon’ble Delhi High Court in Pepsi Foods Pvt. Ltd [2015 (5) TMI 655 - DELHI HIGH COURT] has held that the third proviso to section 254(2A) is constitutionally invalid. The net effect of this judgment is that if the appeal could not be disposed of by the Tribunal for no fault of the assessee, then the power vests with the Tribunal to extend the stay beyond the aggregate period of 365 days. On merits, it is indisputably found that the terms of stay originally granted have been duly complied with. The appeal could not be finally heard for one reason or the other, but, for no fault of the assessee. Considering the entirety of the facts and circumstances of the instant case, we are inclined to grant extension of stay for a further period of six months from today or till the disposal of the appeal, whichever is earlier. Stay application allowed. Issues:1. Extension of stay application for assessment year 2011-12.Analysis:The judgment pertains to a stay application seeking an extension originally granted by the Tribunal for the assessment year 2011-12. The Assessee, represented by Shri Rohit Garg, Advocate, requested the extension, stating that the conditions of the original stay were met, and the delay in appeal disposal was not due to their fault. On the other hand, the Revenue, represented by Shri A.K. Sharma, Sr. DR, opposed the extension. The Tribunal considered the arguments and referred to a precedent set by the Hon’ble Delhi High Court in Pepsi Foods Pvt. Ltd vs. ACIT, which declared the third proviso to section 254(2A) as constitutionally invalid. This ruling allowed the Tribunal to extend the stay beyond 365 days if the appeal delay was not the assessee's fault.On the merits, the Tribunal found that the terms of the original stay were complied with by the Assessee. The appeal delay was not attributed to the Assessee's fault. Considering the circumstances, the Tribunal decided to grant an extension of stay for a further six months from the date of the judgment or until the appeal's disposal, whichever is earlier. Ultimately, the Tribunal allowed the stay application, and the order was pronounced in the open court on 03.03.2017.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
