Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the admission order under Section 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 could be set aside and the insolvency application withdrawn on the basis of a settlement reached before constitution of the Committee of Creditors, by invoking the inherent powers under Rule 11 of the NCLAT Rules, 2016.
Analysis: The settlement deed showed that the parties had arrived at a full and final settlement before the Committee of Creditors was constituted. The record also showed that the constitution of the Committee of Creditors took place after the settlement, and the operational creditor had accepted the compromise. In these circumstances, the admitted insolvency process no longer required continuation, and the inherent powers of the Appellate Tribunal could be exercised to give effect to the settlement and prevent further proceedings on a dispute that had already been resolved.
Conclusion: The impugned admission order was set aside, the Section 9 application was treated as withdrawn, and the insolvency proceedings against the corporate debtor were brought to an end.