Insolvency petition admitted under Section 9 for non-payment of dues

The court admitted the petition under Section 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code for initiating insolvency proceedings against a corporate debtor due to non-payment of dues. The court found that the demand notice was validly served, compliance with the relevant code provisions was met, and all requirements for the appointment of an Interim Resolution Professional were fulfilled. As a result, the court scheduled further proceedings for the declaration of moratorium and the formal appointment of the Interim Resolution Professional.

---

---

Issues involved:
Initiating corporate insolvency resolution process under Section 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 against a corporate debtor for non-payment of dues.

Detailed Analysis:

1. Service of Demand Notice:
The petitioner, an operational creditor, filed a petition under Section 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code against the respondent-corporate debtor for non-payment of dues. The first issue discussed was whether the demand notice was served in accordance with the requirements of Section 5(1) of the Rules. The demand notice was sent by electronic mode, which is a permissible mode of service as per the Rules. The notice was sent to key managerial personnel as defined in the Companies Act, 2013. The petitioner provided evidence that the demand notice was delivered to the e-mail addresses without bouncing back, fulfilling the service requirements.

2. Compliance with Code Provisions:
The petition was filed after the expiry of the 10-day period as required under Section 9 of the Code. However, the petitioner stated that no dispute of unpaid operational debt had been received from the corporate debtor. The petitioner submitted a bank statement showing credits received from the corporate debtor, although a certificate as per Section 9(3)(c) of the Code was not filed. The court found the statement of accounts sufficient and not mandatory for admission of the petition.

3. Appointment of Interim Resolution Professional:
The petitioner proposed the name of a Resolution Professional to be appointed as the Interim Resolution Professional if the petition is admitted. The Resolution Professional provided all requisite information and certifications, confirming no ongoing proceedings under the Code or pending disciplinary actions. The court found that all requirements of Section 9(5)(i) of the Code were fulfilled, leading to the admission of the petition.

4. Admission of Petition:
Considering the fulfillment of all necessary conditions, the petition filed under Section 9 of the Code was admitted. The court scheduled the matter for a formal order of declaration of moratorium and the appointment of the Interim Resolution Professional on a specified date. The order was to be communicated to both parties for further proceedings.

This detailed analysis of the judgment showcases the legal process followed in initiating insolvency proceedings against a corporate debtor for non-payment of dues, emphasizing compliance with statutory provisions and procedural requirements under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code.

---