1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Just a moment...
1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
<h1>Punjab & Haryana High Court rules for respondents in landmark case</h1> The High Court of Punjab and Haryana ruled in favor of the respondents in 2018 (8) TMI 2047. Justices Rajesh Bindal and Amit Rawal presided over the case, ... Time limitation for issuance of SCN - the proceedings are pending for the last more than 16 years when fresh notice for date of hearing was issued on 3.5.2017 - Section 11A (1), (4) and (11) of Central Excise Act - HELD THAT:- The notices in the present cases having been issued more than decade back and the proceedings having not been concluded within reasonable time, the same deserves to be quashed. The High Court of Punjab and Haryana issued a judgment in 2018 (8) TMI 2047. Justices Rajesh Bindal and Amit Rawal presided over the case. Mr. Jagmohan Bansal represented the petitioner, while Mr. Anshuman Chopra represented the respondents. The detailed reasons for the order can be found in a separate order passed in CWP No. 10530 of 2017 - M/s GPI Textiles Limited vs Union of India and others.