Standby maintenance charges not 'Fee for Technical Services' under Income Tax Act. Indian operation income based on cable length.

The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue's appeal and partly allowed the assessee's appeal. Standby maintenance charges were not considered as 'Fee for Technical Services' under Section 9(1)(vii) of the Income Tax Act. Income attributable to Indian operations was to be computed based on the length of the cable in Indian territorial waters. No interest under Section 234B was to be charged due to tax being duly deducted under Section 195.

---

---

Issues Involved:
1. Taxability of Standby Maintenance Charges as 'Fee for Technical Services' under Section 9(1)(vii) of the Income Tax Act, 1961.
2. Attribution of Standby Maintenance Charges to Indian operations.
3. Charging of interest under Section 234B of the Income Tax Act, 1961.

Detailed Analysis:

1. Taxability of Standby Maintenance Charges as 'Fee for Technical Services' under Section 9(1)(vii) of the Income Tax Act, 1961:
The Revenue contended that the amount of Rs. 10,48,73,710 paid to the assessee as standby maintenance charges was in the nature of 'Fee for Technical Services' (FTS) under Section 9(1)(vii) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The CIT(A) concluded that the amount was not FTS, as no services were rendered during the year. The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s decision, referencing earlier Tribunal decisions in the assessee's own case for the years 1998-99 to 2000-01 and 2001-02 to 2008-09, which held that standby maintenance charges were not FTS. The Tribunal emphasized that standby maintenance charges were for maintaining infrastructure, not for actual services rendered, and were in the nature of reimbursement of fixed costs without any profit element.

2. Attribution of Standby Maintenance Charges to Indian Operations:
The assessee argued that the standby maintenance charges should be apportioned based on the length of the cable in Indian territorial waters vis-a-vis the total length worldwide. The CIT(A) disagreed, stating that the entire turnover (receipts from the Indian landing party, TCL) should be treated as turnover for the purpose of computing income attributable to business connection in India. The Tribunal, following its earlier decision, held that the revenue from TCL should be apportioned based on the length of cable in the territorial waters of India to compute the profit or loss attributable to India under Section 9(1)(i) of the Act. The Tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to verify the calculation made by the assessee and recompute the income accordingly.

3. Charging of Interest under Section 234B of the Income Tax Act, 1961:
The assessee contended that interest under Section 234B should not be charged, as the receipts from TCL were subjected to withholding tax under Section 195 of the Act. The Tribunal, referencing the Bombay High Court judgment in NGC Network Asia LLC and its own earlier decisions, held that no interest under Section 234B could be charged in this case, as tax was duly deducted.

Conclusion:
The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue's appeal and partly allowed the assessee's appeal. The standby maintenance charges were not considered as FTS, the income attributable to Indian operations was to be computed based on the length of the cable in Indian territorial waters, and no interest under Section 234B was to be charged.

---