Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether section 52(2) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 applies to a bona fide transfer where the declared consideration is the actual consideration received, but the fair market value exceeds the declared consideration by more than 15 per cent., and whether the shortfall can be treated as a gift excluded from capital gains under section 47(iii) of the Income-tax Act, 1961.
Analysis: Section 52 is a computation provision and its heading, legislative history, Finance Minister's speech, and CBDT circular indicate that sub-section (2) was intended to counter understatement of consideration. The words "full value of the consideration declared" and the structure of the provision show that the revenue must establish not only the prescribed difference between market value and declared consideration but also that the consideration was actually understated. Where the transaction is bona fide and the consideration recorded is the true consideration received, there is no understatement, and the excess of market value over price does not attract section 52(2). The shortfall may, in such a case, amount to a gift in the ordinary sense, and the exemption in section 47(iii) is attracted on that footing.
Conclusion: Section 52(2) does not apply to a bona fide transfer where the true consideration is fully disclosed and there is no understatement. The reference was answered in the affirmative and in favour of the assessee.
Ratio Decidendi: Section 52(2) can be invoked only when the revenue proves both that the fair market value exceeds the declared consideration by the statutory margin and that the declared consideration is understated.