Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the proposed questions of law arising from the Tribunal's order, including those concerning taxation of insurance business surplus, transfer between shareholder and policyholder accounts, disturbance of actuarial valuation, disallowance under section 14A, interest under section 234B, and employee benefit provision, gave rise to substantial questions of law under section 260A.
Analysis: The questions relating to the insurance surplus computation, the treatment of shareholder account surplus, the transfer reflected in actuarial valuation, and the negative reserve issue were treated as covered by earlier decisions and, on that footing, did not warrant further consideration as substantial questions of law. The question concerning employee benefit provision stood concluded against the Revenue by the decision of the Apex Court. The remaining questions on the record were either stated not to arise from the Tribunal's order or were not entertained for want of a substantial question of law. Some questions were separately admitted for consideration in the appeal.
Conclusion: The Court declined to entertain the questions that were found not to raise any substantial question of law, and one issue was held to be concluded by the Apex Court decision; the appeal was admitted only on the remaining questions.