Tribunal denies application, Financial Creditors' claims not "financial debt"

The Tribunal dismissed the application under Section 7 of the IBC, 2016, ruling that the claims of the Financial Creditors did not qualify as "financial debt" under Section 5(8) of the IBC. The Tribunal determined that the amounts deposited were considered deposits under the Companies Act, 2013, allowing the Financial Creditors to seek repayment under relevant provisions. Additionally, the Tribunal found no default in payment of debt as defined by Section 3(12) of the IBC, ultimately denying the application and suggesting alternative legal remedies for the Financial Creditors to recover their funds.

---

---

Issues Involved:
1. Whether the claims of the Financial Creditors fall under the definition of "Financial Debt" as per Section 5(8) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC), 2016.
2. Applicability of the Companies (Acceptance of Deposits) Rules, 2014, and relevant sections of the Companies Act, 2013.
3. Whether the default in payment constitutes a "default" under Section 3(12) of the IBC.
4. Maintainability of the application under Section 7 of the IBC, 2016.

Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:

1. Definition of "Financial Debt" under Section 5(8) of the IBC:
The Tribunal examined the claims of the Financial Creditors, who had deposited money under the Corporate Debtor's investment schemes. The Corporate Debtor had promised returns on these investments, either in the form of plots of land or multi-fold returns on the maturity of the schemes. The Tribunal referred to the definitions in Section 5(7) and 5(8) of the IBC, which define "financial creditor" and "financial debt," respectively. The Tribunal concluded that the claims do not fall within the purview of Section 5(8) of the Code because the Financial Creditors had deposited money under a scheme and had not given a debt to the Corporate Debtor.

2. Applicability of Companies (Acceptance of Deposits) Rules, 2014:
The Tribunal referred to Sections 73, 74, and 76 of the Companies Act, 2013, and the Companies (Acceptance of Deposits) Rules, 2014. These provisions prohibit companies from accepting deposits from the public except in a prescribed manner and provide for the repayment of deposits accepted before the commencement of the Act. The Tribunal noted that the Financial Creditors had deposited money with the Corporate Debtor, which does not qualify as a "financial debt" but rather as a deposit under the Companies Act. Therefore, the Financial Creditors can seek repayment under Chapter V of the Companies Act, 2013, and the relevant rules.

3. Definition of "Default" under Section 3(12) of the IBC:
The Tribunal referred to the definition of "default" in Section 3(12) of the IBC, which means non-payment of debt when it becomes due and payable. Since the Tribunal had already determined that the amounts deposited by the Financial Creditors do not constitute a "debt," it concluded that there is no default in payment of debt under the IBC.

4. Maintainability of the Application under Section 7 of the IBC:
The Tribunal addressed the argument of the Financial Creditors that there was a default in payment, making the application under Section 7 of the IBC maintainable. However, since the Tribunal had already concluded that the deposited amounts do not qualify as "financial debt," it held that there is no default in payment of debt. The Tribunal referenced its decision in the case of Satish Chand Gupta vs. Servel India Private Limited, which had similar facts and legal issues. Consequently, the Tribunal dismissed the application under Section 7 of the IBC, stating that the Financial Creditors have other remedies under the law to recover their deposited amounts.

Conclusion:
The Tribunal dismissed the application under Section 7 of the IBC, 2016, filed by the Financial Creditors against the Corporate Debtor. The Tribunal held that the claims of the Financial Creditors do not fall under the definition of "financial debt" as per Section 5(8) of the IBC. The amounts deposited by the Financial Creditors are considered deposits under the Companies Act, 2013, and the Financial Creditors can seek repayment under Chapter V of the Companies Act, 2013, and the Companies (Acceptance of Deposits) Rules, 2014. The Tribunal also concluded that there is no default in payment of debt as defined under Section 3(12) of the IBC.

---