Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the unregistered sale agreement, written on stamp paper of the prescribed value, required impounding and could be sent to the stamp authority, and whether it could be admitted in evidence for a collateral purpose under the Registration Act.
Analysis: The document was found to have been executed on stamp paper carrying the duty prescribed for a sale agreement under Article 5(j) of Schedule I of the Indian Stamp Act, and was therefore treated as sufficiently stamped. The Court further held that Section 49 of the Registration Act permits an unregistered document to be received in evidence for a collateral transaction, and that when such a document is tendered not as proof of completed transfer but for a permissible collateral purpose, the question of impounding and sending it to the Deputy Collector did not arise.
Conclusion: The application to impound the document was rightly dismissed, and the revision petitioner was not entitled to interference.
Final Conclusion: The unregistered sale agreement was held admissible for a collateral purpose and was not liable to be impounded on the facts found, resulting in dismissal of the revision.
Ratio Decidendi: An unregistered document that is sufficiently stamped may be admitted for a collateral purpose under Section 49 of the Registration Act, and impounding is unnecessary where no deficiency in stamp duty is found.