Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:
TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        <h1>Appellant granted interest under Sec.11BB of Central Excise Act in successful appeal</h1> The Tribunal allowed the appeal, holding that the appellant is entitled to interest under Sec.11BB of the Central Excise Act,1944. The decision was made ... Interest on delayed refund - actual date of filing of the refund application by the appellant - Section 11BB of the Central Excise Act,1944 - HELD THAT:- From the available records and the detailed date chart furnished by the appellant at page 8 – 11 of the appeal paper book, It is found that the refund application was filed by the appellant on 13.06.2005. The said refund application was decided by the Asst. Commissioner, vide his order dt.21.06.2009, as stated under para 2 of the impugned order dt.20.02.2018, under which the refund was sanctioned but was credited to the Consumer Welfare Fund on the ground of unjust enrichment. The unjust enrichment aspect relating to the said refund application dt.13.06.2005, after several rounds of litigation was resolved by the Commissioner (Appeals), vide the Order-in-Appeal dt.22.02.2016. Therefore, it is not correct to say that the refund application was filed by appellant on 22.07.2016 basing on the Order-in- Appeal dt.22.02.2016. The position of law in this regard has been well settled by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of RANBAXY LABORATORIES LTD. VERSUS UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. [2011 (10) TMI 16 - SUPREME COURT], wherein it was held that Sec.11BB of the Central Excise Act lays down that, in case any duty paid, is found refundable, and if the duty is not refunded within the period of 3 months from the date of receipt of the application, submitted under Sub-Sec.(1) of Sec.11B of the Act, then the applicant shall be paid interest at such rate, as may be fixed by the Central Government, on expiry of a period of 3 months from the date of receipt of the application. Thus, the refund application was filed by the appellant on 13.06.2005 and the refund was finally paid on 15.09.2016, and in terms of Sec.11BB of the Central Excise Act, the appellant is entitled to the interest, at the rate as notified by the Central Government - appeal allowed - decided in favor of appellant. Issues:1. Denial of payment of interest under Sec.11BB of the Central Excise Act,1944.Analysis:The appellant, a company formerly known as Gulf Oil Corporation Ltd., filed a refund claim under Sec.11B of the Central Excise Act,1944, seeking a refund of excise duty paid on quality control samples from 1986-87 to 2004-05. The refund was initially credited to the Consumer Welfare Fund due to unjust enrichment concerns. After multiple litigations, the refund was sanctioned and disbursed to the appellant. Subsequently, the appellant requested the release of interest amounting to Rs. 10,65,233.00 under Sec.11BB of the Act. However, the request was denied by the Asst. Commissioner, stating that the refund was sanctioned within the stipulated period of three months from the application date, hence no interest was payable.Upon appeal, the Commissioner (Appeals) upheld the denial of interest payment, leading to the appellant's appeal before the Tribunal. The crucial issue revolved around determining the actual date of the refund application. The Commissioner's findings were contradictory, mentioning different dates of application submission. The appellant argued that the application was filed in 2005, not in 2016 as claimed by the authorities, supported by a detailed date chart.The Tribunal analyzed the facts and legal precedents, including the Supreme Court judgments in similar cases. Referring to the case law, it was established that interest under Sec.11BB is payable if the refund is not granted within three months of the application. The Court emphasized the importance of timely communication of deficiencies in refund applications by the Revenue. Based on the settled legal position, the Tribunal concluded that the appellant filed the refund application in 2005 and was entitled to interest as per the Act.Therefore, the Tribunal allowed the appeal, holding that the appellant is entitled to interest as notified by the Central Government under Sec.11BB of the Central Excise Act,1944. The decision was made in favor of the appellant, granting consequential relief.This detailed analysis highlights the legal journey of the appellant's refund claim, addressing the denial of interest payment and the subsequent appeal leading to a favorable outcome before the Tribunal.

        Topics

        ActsIncome Tax
        No Records Found