1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Just a moment...
1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
<h1>Penalty cannot be enhanced without notice under Section 35A - CESTAT Kolkata ruling</h1> The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Kolkata held that penalty cannot be enhanced under the first proviso to Section 35A of the Central Excise Act without ... Enhancement of penalty without issuing notice under first proviso to Sec. 35A is not accordance with law β Moreover, duty involved in the matter has been paid and penalty imposed by original authority have been discharged β Impugned order is violating Sec. 35A, hence set aside The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Kolkata held that the penalty cannot be enhanced under the first proviso to Section 35A of the Central Excise Act without issuing a notice to the appellant. The appellant had paid the duty and penalty imposed by the original authority. The impugned order was deemed unsustainable as the appellant was not given a fair opportunity. The appellant succeeded in the case.