Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the settlement memorandum between the parties should be accepted in the insolvency appeal, resulting in withdrawal of the section 9 application and setting aside of the initiation of insolvency proceedings.
Analysis: The parties placed the settlement on record and admitted its contents. The operational creditor sought withdrawal of the section 9 application, and the corporate debtor undertook to honour the post-dated cheques and pay the IRP costs. In view of the settlement, the Tribunal exercised its powers under rule 11 and accepted the memorandum of understanding.
Conclusion: The appeal was allowed, the impugned order admitting the section 9 application was set aside, and the operational creditor was permitted to withdraw the application.
Final Conclusion: The insolvency proceedings stood terminated on the basis of the recorded settlement, with the parties bound by the memorandum of understanding and liberty reserved to seek revival in the event of default.
Ratio Decidendi: A concluded settlement between the parties may be given effect to in insolvency appellate proceedings under the Tribunal's inherent powers, leading to withdrawal of the insolvency application and setting aside of consequential insolvency actions.