Limitations on Input Tax Credit for Demo Cars and Ancillary Services under GST

The ruling determined that Input Tax Credit (ITC) cannot be claimed on demo cars or ancillary services like insurance and repair & maintenance under GST provisions. Despite being essential for business purposes, demo cars did not meet the specific criteria outlined in Section 17(5)(a) and (ab) for availing ITC. The ruling emphasized the restrictive nature of these sections in disallowing ITC for motor vehicles and related services, clarifying that the purpose of purchasing demo cars did not align with the criteria for claiming ITC. Ultimately, it was concluded that GST paid on demo cars and ancillary services cannot be set off against output tax under GST.

---

---

Issues:
1. Whether Input Tax Credit (ITC) can be availed on demo cars used for demonstration and set off against output tax payable under GST.
2. Whether Input Tax Credit (ITC) can be availed on ancillary input services such as insurance and repair & maintenance in respect of demo cars.

Analysis:

Issue 1:
The applicant argued that demo cars are essential for sales promotion and are capitalized in the books, making them eligible for ITC under Section 16(1) of the CGST Act. However, Section 17(5)(a) restricts ITC on motor vehicles unless used for specific purposes, overriding Sections 16(1) and 18(1). The ruling emphasized that ITC for demo cars is disallowed under Section 17(5)(a) despite being used for business purposes.

Issue 2:
Regarding ancillary input services, Section 17(5)(ab) disallows ITC on services related to motor vehicles unless used for specified purposes. The ruling found that demo cars did not meet the criteria under Section 17(5)(a) or (ab), making ITC on ancillary services ineligible. The ruling concluded that GST paid on demo cars and related services cannot be claimed as ITC or set off against output tax under GST.

The Advance Ruling Authority highlighted the exhaustive and restrictive nature of Section 17(5)(a) and (ab) in limiting ITC for motor vehicles and related services. The ruling clarified that even though demo cars are essential for business operations, they do not meet the criteria specified under the relevant sections for availing ITC. The ruling emphasized that the prefix "further supply" in Section 17(5)(a) implies resale, which was not the purpose of purchasing demo cars. Ultimately, the ruling concluded that ITC on demo cars and ancillary services is inadmissible under the GST provisions, as outlined in Section 17(5)(a) and (ab).

---