Appellant's Appeal Partially Allowed, Remand for Evaluation.

The appellant's appeal was partially allowed by the Tribunal. The Tribunal remanded certain issues to the CIT (A) for further evaluation based on relevant legal precedents, including a decision by the Bombay High Court regarding the set off of capital loss against capital gain. The Tribunal also condoned a delay in filing the appeal due to a clerical error and allowed the appeal to proceed on its merits. Additionally, the Tribunal directed the CIT (A) to consider the appellant's claim regarding the provision for diminution of the value of investment in computing book profits, based on a decision by the ITAT, Kolkata Bench.

---

---

Issues:
1. Set off of capital loss against capital gain.
2. Delay in filing the appeal before the Tribunal.
3. Allowability of provision for diminution of value of investment in computing book profits.

Issue 1: Set off of capital loss against capital gain:
The appellant challenged the CIT (A)'s decision regarding the availability of capital loss of a specific assessment year for set off against capital gain in a subsequent year. The appellant argued that prior to the amendment of relevant sections, only one category of carried forward capital loss was available for set off. The Tribunal noted that the issues raised were covered by previous judgments, including one by the Bombay High Court. As these decisions were not available to the AO/CIT (A) earlier, the Tribunal remanded the case to the CIT (A) for reevaluation based on the applicability of the said judgments. The Tribunal allowed the grounds related to this issue for further examination.

Issue 2: Delay in filing the appeal before the Tribunal:
The appellant cited a delay of 64 days in filing the appeal due to a clerical error, supported by an affidavit. The Tribunal, considering the reasonable cause for the delay, condoned the delay and proceeded to adjudicate the appeal on its merits.

Issue 3: Allowability of provision for diminution of value of investment in computing book profits:
The appellant contended that the provision for diminution of the value of investment should be an allowable deduction for computing book profits. The Tribunal referred to a decision by the ITAT, Kolkata Bench, which supported the appellant's position. Consequently, the Tribunal directed the CIT (A) to examine the said decision and decide on the claim of the assessee. The grounds related to this issue were treated as allowed for statistical purposes.

In conclusion, the appeal of the assessee was allowed in part, with certain issues remanded for further examination by the CIT (A) based on relevant legal precedents and decisions. The Tribunal provided detailed reasoning for each issue raised by the appellant, ensuring a comprehensive analysis of the legal aspects involved in the judgment.

---