Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:
TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        <h1>Extension granted for Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process to finalize resolution plan</h1> The Tribunal granted a 60-day extension to the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) beyond the statutory 330-day limit, based on the NCLT's ... Seeking grant of extension of 60 days in CIRP time period beyond 330 days - Rule 11 of NCLT rules 2016 read with Section 60(5)(c), 12(3) of Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 - HELD THAT:- In the present case the Committee of Creditors in its 13th meeting held on 16.12.2019 with 72.40% vote share approved resolution for extension of 60 days of Insolvency Resolution Period mainly on the ground that the resolution plan is under consideration of CoC. It is mentioned in the minutes that the resolution plan is on the verge of finalization and may take another one month to finalize to the resolution plan in respect of the corporate debtor. In the facts the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process period in the present case is further extended by 60 days from 01.01.2020. The Resolution Professional and the members of Committee of Creditors are directed to expedite the possibility of achieving resolution of the stressed assets of the corporate debtor within the extended period. List on 28.01.2020. Issues:1. Extension of CIRP time period beyond 330 days.2. Application for extension based on inherent powers of NCLT under Rule 11 of NCLT rules 2016 and Section 60(5)(c), 12(3) of Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016.3. Consideration of extension in exceptional cases to achieve resolution and avoid liquidation.4. Reference to Supreme Court decision regarding time limit for CIRP completion.5. Approval of extension by Committee of Creditors in a meeting.6. Direction to expedite resolution within the extended period.Analysis:1. The Tribunal addressed the issue of extending the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) time period beyond the statutory limit of 330 days. The resolution professional filed an application seeking a 60-day extension, citing the inherent powers of the NCLT under Rule 11 of NCLT rules 2016 and Section 60(5)(c), 12(3) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016.2. The Tribunal noted that while the usual time limit for CIRP completion is 330 days, exceptions can be made in certain cases to facilitate resolution and prevent liquidation. This discretion lies with the Adjudicating Authority (NCLT) to extend the time limit, as highlighted in a Supreme Court decision where the word 'mandatorily' was struck down as arbitrary, allowing for extensions beyond 330 days under specific circumstances.3. The Committee of Creditors, in a meeting, with a 72.40% vote share, approved the resolution for a 60-day extension of the Insolvency Resolution Period. The reason cited was that the resolution plan was nearing finalization and required additional time for completion. The Tribunal acknowledged this approval and directed the Resolution Professional and the Committee of Creditors to expedite efforts to achieve resolution within the extended period.4. Consequently, the Tribunal allowed the application for extension, granting an additional 60 days beyond the initial 330-day period starting from 01.01.2020. The decision emphasized the importance of promptly resolving the stressed assets of the corporate debtor within the extended timeframe to benefit all stakeholders involved.5. In another matter, specific timelines were granted to the parties involved to file replies and proofs in compliance with previous orders, indicating the Tribunal's adherence to procedural fairness and efficiency in handling the insolvency proceedings.6. Overall, the Tribunal's judgment showcased a balanced approach, considering the legal framework, precedents, and the practicalities of the case to ensure a fair and efficient resolution process for the corporate debtor while safeguarding the interests of all stakeholders involved in the insolvency proceedings.

        Topics

        ActsIncome Tax
        No Records Found