Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:
TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
By Case ID:

When case Id is present, search is done only for this

Sort By:
RelevanceDefaultDate
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        <h1>Supreme Court upholds validation of taxes on petrol and diesel oil, dismisses appeals</h1> <h3>Mahe Beach Trading Co. and Ors. Versus Union Territory of Pondicherry and Ors.</h3> The Supreme Court dismissed the appeals, upholding the Validation Act as intra vires. The Court found that the Pondicherry Legislature had the competence ... - Issues Involved:1. Excessive delegation of legislative power.2. Repugnancy of Sections 3 & 4 of the Validation Act to Section 7 of the Pondicherry (Administration) Act, 1962 and Section 21 of the Government of Union Territories Act, 1963.3. Legislative competence of the Pondicherry Legislature to enact laws with retrospective effect.Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:1. Excessive Delegation of Legislative Power:The appellants argued that the Validation Act involved excessive delegation of legislative power, claiming that the Pondicherry Legislature had abdicated its essential legislative functions. They contended that Sections 3 and 4 of the Validation Act lacked discernible guidelines or policy, making the delegation unbridled and absolute.The Court, however, found that the question of excessive delegation did not arise in this case. It emphasized that the tax in question had been levied in 1970 under the Municipal Decree of 1880, and the Validation Act was enacted by a competent legislature. Sections 3 and 4 of the Validation Act specifically empowered the levy of taxes, duties, cesses, or fees, and validated the taxes already levied. The Court concluded that the Validation Act did not involve any further act of subordinate legislation, as the essential ingredients of the levy and assessment of tax on petrol and diesel oil were already known and available to the legislature. Therefore, the Validation Act did not suffer from excessive delegation.2. Repugnancy to Section 7 of the Pondicherry (Administration) Act, 1962 and Section 21 of the Government of Union Territories Act, 1963:The appellants contended that Sections 3 and 4 of the Validation Act were repugnant to Section 7 of the Pondicherry (Administration) Act, 1962, and Section 21 of the Government of Union Territories Act, 1963. They argued that the expression 'lawfully levied' under Section 7 meant that the levy under the Municipal Decree had to be validly and actually levied, and the Validation Act could not override these provisions.The Court rejected this argument, stating that Section 7 of the Pondicherry Administration Act merely continued existing taxes and did not prohibit the imposition of new taxes by a competent legislature. The Validation Act explicitly stated that taxes could be levied notwithstanding the provisions of Section 7 of the Pondicherry Administration Act or any other provision of any Act passed by the Legislature of the Union Territory of Pondicherry. Therefore, the Validation Act was not repugnant to Section 7 of the Pondicherry Administration Act, 1962, or Section 21 of the Government of Union Territories Act, 1963.3. Legislative Competence of the Pondicherry Legislature to Enact Laws with Retrospective Effect:The appellants argued that the Pondicherry Legislature did not have plenary powers to enact laws with retrospective effect or laws contrary to those made by the Parliament under Articles 239 and 239A of the Constitution. They contended that the Pondicherry Legislature could not pass the Validation Act, which had the effect of re-enacting and imposing restrictions on diesel and petrol with retrospective effect.The Court held that Article 239A of the Constitution and Section 18 of the Government of Union Territories Act, 1963, empowered the Pondicherry Legislature to make laws for the Union Territory with respect to matters enumerated in the State List or the Concurrent List. The Court noted that the Pondicherry Legislature had the power to legislate with retrospective effect and pass a Validation Act, similar to the powers of a State Legislature. The Validation Act, therefore, was within the legislative competence of the Pondicherry Legislature.Conclusion:The Supreme Court dismissed the appeals, finding no merit in the arguments presented by the appellants. The Validation Act was held to be intra vires, and the Pondicherry Legislature was deemed competent to enact the law with retrospective effect. The Court upheld the levy of the municipal tax on petrol and diesel oil and validated the taxes already levied under the Municipal Decree of 1880. The appeals were dismissed with costs.

        Topics

        ActsIncome Tax
        No Records Found