Tribunal remands case for further examination due to lack of verification on agricultural land sale deposits.

The Tribunal remanded the case back to the AO for further examination after finding that the tax authorities did not adequately verify the source of deposits in the bank account sourced from the sale of agricultural land. The appellant's inability to produce the purchasers raised doubts, and the tax department was criticized for not conducting thorough investigations. The appeal was allowed for statistical purposes, stressing the importance of a comprehensive inquiry into the transactions.

---

---

Issues:
Assessment of addition made by AO on account of deposits in bank account sourced from sale of agricultural land.

Analysis:
The appellant challenged the order of CIT(A)-2 Chandigarh regarding the addition made by the AO on account of deposits in the bank account sourced from the sale of agricultural land. The appellant contended that necessary evidences on record were not correctly appreciated. The AO considered the appellant to be an agriculturist with declared agriculture income but found significant deposits in the bank account sourced from the sale of agricultural land. The appellant explained that the deposits were from the sale proceeds of agricultural land in question. However, the summons issued to the purchasers returned undelivered, raising doubts on the source of cash deposits.

The CIT-DR argued that the appellant failed to substantiate the claim adequately. The affidavit filed by an eye-witness related to the transaction was dismissed as irrelevant due to being the sister of the appellant. The appellant's affidavit stated the details of the land sale and the subsequent bank deposits. The AO traced the PANs of the purchasers but did not conduct further verification. The tax authorities were criticized for not thoroughly investigating the transactions and relying on the appellant to produce purchasers who were beyond the appellant's control.

The Tribunal found that the tax authorities did not adequately exercise their powers in verifying the transactions. Given the inability of the appellant to produce the purchasers, the tax department should have taken steps to examine the issues further, especially considering the PAN details available. The case was remanded back to the AO for a detailed examination and a speaking order after providing the appellant with a fair opportunity to present all relevant facts and evidence. The appeal of the appellant was allowed for statistical purposes, emphasizing the need for a thorough investigation into the source of deposits in the bank account.

---