2013 (6) TMI 889 - AT - Income Tax

ITAT Partially Allows Appeal: Penalty Disallowance Overturned, Sections 14A and 40(a)(ia) Ruled in Assessee's Favor

Kasat Securities Pvt. Ltd. Versus ACIT, Range-11, Pune

The ITAT allowed the appeal in part for statistical purposes. The disallowance of penalty charges, addition on account of discount, disallowance under ... - Issues Involved:1. Disallowance of penalty of Rs. 67,531/-2. Addition on account of discount of Rs. 2,05,230/-3. Disallowance of Rs. 16,67,343/- u/s 14A4. Addition of Rs. 53,00,631/- u/s 40(a)(ia)5. Disallowance of payment of Rs. 35 lakhs made to Sri Rajesh Kasat u/s 40A(2)6. Disallowance of foreign travel expenses of Rs. 1,33,526/-7. Addition of Rs. 10,57,000/- on account of under-valuation of closing stock8. Non-allowance of set off of carry forward loss of Rs. 3,71,640/-Summary:1. Disallowance of penalty of Rs. 67,531/-:The assessee contested the disallowance of Rs. 67,531/- as penalty charges. The ITAT found the issue covered in favor of the assessee by the Hon'ble Delhi High Court in CIT Vs. Prasad and Company, where such penalties paid to the stock exchange were deemed deductible as business expenditure. The ITAT directed the deletion of the addition.2. Addition on account of discount of Rs. 2,05,230/-:The assessee failed to provide specific details of clients to whom excess brokerage was refunded. The CIT(A) upheld the disallowance due to lack of evidence and non-admission of additional evidence under Rule 46A. The ITAT remanded the issue back to the Assessing Officer to allow the assessee another opportunity to substantiate the claim.3. Disallowance of Rs. 16,67,343/- u/s 14A:The assessee argued that the shares were held as stock in trade and the dividend was incidental. The ITAT, following the Pune Bench decision in Smt. Apoorva Patni and others, held that no disallowance u/s 14A is warranted when shares are held as stock in trade. The ITAT directed the deletion of the addition.4. Addition of Rs. 53,00,631/- u/s 40(a)(ia):The assessee paid TDS to the government before the due date of filing the return. The ITAT, relying on the Pune Bench decision in H.A. Developers, held that no disallowance u/s 40(a)(ia) is warranted if TDS is deposited before the due date. The ITAT directed the deletion of the addition.5. Disallowance of payment of Rs. 35 lakhs made to Sri Rajesh Kasat u/s 40A(2):The ITAT found the sudden increase in remuneration to be questionable and remanded the issue back to the Assessing Officer to verify the reasonableness of the payment and the treatment of similar payments in subsequent years.6. Disallowance of foreign travel expenses of Rs. 1,33,526/-:The assessee failed to provide details and business necessity of foreign travel expenses. The ITAT upheld the CIT(A)'s disallowance due to lack of evidence.7. Addition of Rs. 10,57,000/- on account of under-valuation of closing stock:The assessee consistently followed the weighted average cost method for valuation, accepted by the department. The ITAT held that there should be no deviation from the consistent method and directed the deletion of the addition.8. Non-allowance of set off of carry forward loss of Rs. 3,71,640/-:The ITAT, following the Mumbai Bench decision in Gajendra Kumar T. Agarwal, allowed the set off of brought forward loss from derivatives against the profits of the same business in subsequent years.Conclusion:The appeal filed by the assessee was partly allowed for statistical purposes.