Limitation and debt recovery dispute prevent Section 7 insolvency admission where default was long overdue and recovery proceedings continued.

An application under Section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code was treated as time-barred because limitation was held to run from the date of default, not from the commencement of the Code. The Tribunal noted that the debt and default had already been the subject of recovery proceedings and an adjudicated decree long before the insolvency filing, and that the application was brought after an inordinate delay while recovery efforts continued. On those facts, the matter was found to be essentially a debt recovery dispute rather than a suitable case for corporate insolvency resolution, and the application was rejected.

---

---

Issues: Whether the application under Section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 was barred by limitation and whether the insolvency process could be admitted in the circumstances of a long-pending recovery dispute.

Analysis: The default and the debt had already been the subject of recovery proceedings and an adjudicated decree long before the insolvency application was filed. The period of limitation was held to run from the date of default and not from the commencement of the Code. On the facts, the Tribunal found that the application was moved after an inordinate delay, with recovery proceedings still continuing for years, and that the case was essentially in the nature of debt recovery rather than a viable insolvency resolution matter.

Conclusion: The application under Section 7 was not admitted and was rejected as barred by limitation and unsuitable for initiation of corporate insolvency resolution process.

---