Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: (i) Whether an interim workable arrangement should be made for delivery, custody, transportation and storage of the metro rails pending final adjudication of the suits, and ancillary directions issued regarding storage charges, indemnity, cooperation and withholding of payment.
Analysis: The dispute concerned urgent delivery of metro rails required for a project of national importance. As the rival claims between the parties remained pending and no final adjudication was being made, the Court fashioned only a temporary arrangement to prevent delay in delivery. The order directed the defendant in possession of the rails to release specified quantities, required prior intimation of transport details, permitted recovery of storage charges during phased delivery, required cooperation in handing over the rails, cast an obligation on the plaintiff to comply with applicable law and indemnify for damage, fixed a deadline for delivery to the project site, and protected the amount claimed in the connected suit by restraining disbursal or encashment pending further orders.
Conclusion: An interim arrangement was directed in favour of neither side on the merits, with operative directions for release and transport of the rails and preservation of the rival monetary claims until further hearing.