Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI OCR

Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        1930 (1) TMI 17 - HC - Indian Laws

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Limitation, partnership continuity, and bona fide purchaser protection turn on subsisting title, implied agreement, and due enquiry. A Hindu plaintiff's suit for possession of immovable property based on subsisting title after the death of a Hindu female was treated as governed by ...
                        Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
                          Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.

                              Limitation, partnership continuity, and bona fide purchaser protection turn on subsisting title, implied agreement, and due enquiry.

                              A Hindu plaintiff's suit for possession of immovable property based on subsisting title after the death of a Hindu female was treated as governed by Article 141 of the Limitation Act, 1908, not the residuary Article 120, so the claim was within time when filed within 12 years. The death of one family member did not dissolve the factory partnership, because the business was treated as a continuing arrangement and an implied agreement negatived dissolution on death. Protection under Section 41 of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882 was unavailable to defendant 9 because he failed to prove the due enquiry required to establish bona fide purchase for value.




                              Issues: (i) Whether the suit was governed by Article 141 of the Limitation Act, 1908, or by the residuary Article 120, and whether it was within limitation; (ii) Whether the death of one member of the family dissolved the partnership in the factory business; (iii) Whether defendant 9 was entitled to the protection of Section 41 of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882 as a bona fide purchaser for value.

                              Issue (i): Whether the suit was governed by Article 141 of the Limitation Act, 1908, or by the residuary Article 120, and whether it was within limitation.

                              Analysis: The factory was treated as immovable property and the plaintiff's claim was held to be one in which the subsisting title to the property was material. Article 141, which governs a suit for possession of immovable property by a Hindu entitled on the death of a Hindu female, was held to be the appropriate provision. Article 120 was held inapplicable because it applies only where no other article governs the case. Since the suit was brought within 12 years of the death of the plaintiff's mother, the claim was within time.

                              Conclusion: The suit was within limitation under Article 141 and not barred by limitation.

                              Issue (ii): Whether the death of one member of the family dissolved the partnership in the factory business.

                              Analysis: The ownership of the factory was treated as one partnership comprising all the owners, and the smaller family share was not accepted as a separate partnership within the larger one. Section 239 of the Contract Act, 1872 was read as not supporting the trial Court's view that such a nested partnership existed. In view of the long continuance of the business and the absence of any treatment of the business as dissolved on earlier deaths of partners, an implied contract was inferred that the death of one partner would not dissolve the business. Section 253(10) of the Contract Act, 1872 was therefore held not to operate so as to dissolve the partnership on the death of Ram Narain.

                              Conclusion: The death of Ram Narain did not dissolve the partnership business.

                              Issue (iii): Whether defendant 9 was entitled to the protection of Section 41 of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882 as a bona fide purchaser for value.

                              Analysis: Protection under Section 41 of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882 required proof that the transferee made the necessary enquiry as to the transferors' authority to sell. Defendant 9 did not adduce satisfactory evidence of such enquiry, and the evidence of his agent did not establish negotiation of the sale-deed or due enquiry. The statutory condition for protection was therefore not satisfied.

                              Conclusion: Defendant 9 was not entitled to the benefit of Section 41 of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882.

                              Final Conclusion: The decree of the trial Court was set aside and the matter was sent back for decision on the remaining issues, with the plaintiff succeeding on the questions of limitation and transferee protection.

                              Ratio Decidendi: Where a Hindu plaintiff's claim to immovable property is based on subsisting title after the death of a Hindu female, Article 141 applies rather than the residuary article, and a transferee can claim protection only by proving the due enquiry required by Section 41 of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882.


                              Full Summary is available for active users!
                              Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                              Topics

                              ActsIncome Tax
                              No Records Found