TaxTMI Login
AI OCR ✕Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Just a moment...
AI OCR ✕Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether a suit brought in the firm name was maintainable where the alleged partnership was entered into by the members of the firm, and whether a firm as such could enter into a contract of partnership with another person.
Analysis: A firm is only a compendious name for its partners and has no separate corporate existence. On that footing, a firm as such cannot itself be treated as a contracting person for the purpose of entering into a partnership under the law of contract. But if the members of the firm, acting jointly or through authorised agency, in fact entered into the agreement, the transaction is not void merely because it was described as one made by the firm. Order 30 of the Code of Civil Procedure permits partners carrying on business to sue in the firm name as a matter of procedural , and the proceedings may continue in that name even when the partners are disclosed. The question, therefore, is whether the real parties in interest were the partners of the plaintiff firm and whether the plaint was signed by a person authorised to act for them; if so, the suit is not bad merely because the firm name was used.
Conclusion: The suit was held maintainable in principle, and the decree of the lower appellate court was set aside with a remand for disposal according to law.
Ratio Decidendi: A partnership firm has no separate legal personality apart from its partners, but a contract entered into by the partners themselves or their authorised agent may found enforceable rights, and a suit may be maintained in the firm name under Order 30 of the Code of Civil Procedure.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
