Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the High Court should interfere under writ jurisdiction with a show-cause notice in a tax matter where the controversy whether the transaction was an inter-State sale or an intra-State sale turned on disputed facts and the assessee had an opportunity to reply before the assessing authority.
Analysis: The dispute depended on the genuineness and effect of the commission-agent arrangement and on factual determination of the nature of the purchase and movement of goods. Such a question was treated as a mixed question of fact and law, not fit for determination for the first time in writ proceedings. The availability of a statutory opportunity to submit a reply to the notice and have the assessing authority decide the issue first weighed against interference. In tax matters, the writ court would ordinarily not interdict a notice at the threshold unless the notice was ex facie without jurisdiction, and mere assertion of want of jurisdiction was insufficient where factual inquiry was required.
Conclusion: The show-cause notice was not liable to be quashed in writ jurisdiction and the assessees were required to pursue their reply before the assessing authority.
Final Conclusion: The appeals failed, and the order relegating the appellants to the statutory forum for the first instance determination of the disputed tax issue was upheld.
Ratio Decidendi: A tax show-cause notice will not be interfered with in writ jurisdiction where the objection depends on disputed facts and the notice is not shown to be wholly without jurisdiction on its face.