High Court directs petitioner to file stay application, orders payment of 20% outstanding amount. Writ petition dismissed. The High Court directed the petitioner to appear before the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax with a stay petition covering specific aspects. After the ...
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
High Court directs petitioner to file stay application, orders payment of 20% outstanding amount. Writ petition dismissed.
The High Court directed the petitioner to appear before the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax with a stay petition covering specific aspects. After the petitioner filed the stay application, the Commissioner ordered payment of 20% of the outstanding amount by a specified date. The Court found no reason to intervene and dismissed the writ petition, closing the connected miscellaneous petition without costs.
Issues: Challenge to recovery proceedings initiated by Income Tax Department for assessment years 2010-11 to 2013-14.
Analysis: The petitioner had challenged the recovery proceedings initiated by the Income Tax Department for assessment years 2010-11 to 2013-14. The High Court had earlier set aside an order as being mechanical and directed the petitioner to appear before the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax with a stay petition covering aspects like prima facie case, financial stringency, and balance of payment. The Principal Commissioner was instructed to pass appropriate orders within two weeks of the completion of the personal hearing. The petitioner subsequently filed a stay application for consideration of these aspects, and the respondent passed an order in response.
The respondent sought a report from the Assessing Officer to determine the prima facie case since the petitioner had submitted additional evidence during the stay application. Subsequently, the Commissioner issued a speaking order directing the assessee to pay 20% of the outstanding amount by a specified date. The Court, upon review, found no grounds to interfere in the matter and dismissed the writ petition. The connected miscellaneous petition was closed with no costs imposed.
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.