Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether a condition requiring deposit of Rs. 5 crores could be imposed while granting statutory bail under Section 167(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.
Analysis: Statutory bail under Section 167(2) is triggered on failure to file the charge sheet within the prescribed period, and the accused then acquires an indefeasible right to be released on bail if prepared to furnish bail. The only requirement contemplated is furnishing of bail, and the right cannot be defeated by adding harsh or extraneous conditions unrelated to the bail bond. A condition demanding deposit of a large sum of money was therefore held to be beyond the scope of statutory bail.
Conclusion: The impugned condition directing deposit of Rs. 5 crores was set aside, and the petitioner was held entitled to statutory bail without such onerous condition.