Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the inference of concealment could be drawn from the proved facts, whether the burden lay on the Revenue to displace the presumption of good faith, and whether the case raised a question of law warranting a reference to the High Court.
Analysis: The proper legal effect of proved facts was held to be a question of law. The normal presumption operates in favour of good faith and not bad faith on the part of the assessee, so the Revenue had to begin with the presumption that the relevant entry was made in the ordinary course and without intent to conceal income. The Commissioner's approach was found to be open to challenge for possible misappreciation of facts and misapplication of law, and the soundness of the legal conclusions drawn from the proved facts could be tested by the Court.
Conclusion: A question of law arose on which the Commissioner could be compelled to make a reference to the High Court, and the application succeeded.
Final Conclusion: The assessee obtained an order directing reference on the legal question arising from the finding of concealment, with costs awarded in his favour.
Ratio Decidendi: The legal effect of proved facts and the inference of concealment from them are questions of law, and the Revenue must rebut the presumption of good faith before an adverse inference of concealment can be sustained.