Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether an Abkari officer invested by the Bombay Abkari Act with powers of investigation, arrest, search and detention under the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1898, is a police officer within the meaning of Section 25 of the Indian Evidence Act so that a confession made to him during such investigation is inadmissible.
Analysis: The expression "police officer" in Section 25 was construed in a broad and non-technical sense, having regard to the protective purpose of the provision against confessions obtained by undue influence during custodial investigation. The Bombay Abkari Act conferred upon Abkari officers substantial powers ordinarily exercised by police officers in the investigation of cognizable offences, including the powers of investigation under Section 41 of the Bombay Abkari Act, 1878 and allied powers of arrest, search and detention. The distinction drawn in earlier cases involving officers with more limited powers was held inapplicable where the officer in question exercised materially the same powers as an officer in charge of a police station.
Conclusion: An Abkari officer exercising the investigative powers conferred by the Bombay Abkari Act is a police officer within Section 25 of the Indian Evidence Act, and a confession made to such an officer in the course of investigation is inadmissible.