Email acknowledgment of debt can extend limitation and support maintainability of a section 9 insolvency application.

An email sent before expiry of limitation was treated as a valid acknowledgment of debt under section 18 of the Limitation Act, 1963, even though it was not addressed to the creditor and did not state the liability with technical precision. The attached statement of account, the surrounding context, and the absence of evidence that the sender lacked authority supported attribution to the corporate debtor. The objection based on section 5 of the Information Technology Act, 2000 was not accepted in the insolvency context, and the section 9 application under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 was found maintainable because the debt was not time-barred and the section 8 and 9 requirements were met.

---

---

Issues: Whether the email dated 19 April 2016 amounted to an acknowledgment of liability under the Limitation Act so as to save limitation, and whether the application under section 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 was maintainable and liable to be admitted.

Analysis: The email was sent before expiry of the prescribed period and therefore could operate, if otherwise valid, as a fresh acknowledgment under section 18 of the Limitation Act, 1963. An acknowledgment need not specify the exact nature of the liability and may be addressed to a person other than the creditor. The attachment of the statement of account, coupled with the context and the absence of material showing that the sender was unauthorised, supported the conclusion that the communication was made on behalf of the corporate debtor. The objection based on section 5 of the Information Technology Act, 2000 was not accepted in the insolvency context, and the Limitation Act was applied only to the extent consistent with the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 under section 238. Since the debt was not barred by limitation and the requirements under sections 8 and 9 were complied with, the application was maintainable.

Conclusion: The email constituted a valid acknowledgment of debt, the claim was within limitation, and the section 9 application was maintainable and admitted.

Final Conclusion: Corporate insolvency resolution proceedings were directed to commence against the corporate debtor, with moratorium and consequential directions under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016.

Ratio Decidendi: An acknowledgment of liability in writing may be sufficient even if addressed to a person other than the creditor and, where made before expiry of limitation, can extend limitation for insolvency proceedings when consistent with the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016.

---