Tribunal Affirms Quashing of Re-assessment Orders Due to Violations of Due Process in 2007-08 and 2008-09 Tax Years.

The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue's appeals and the assessee's cross objections, affirming the quashing of re-assessment orders for assessment years 2007-08 and 2008-09. The Tribunal held that the Assessing Officer's failure to independently address the assessee's objections before completing the assessments violated due process, rendering the assessment orders legally unsustainable under section 147 of the Income Tax Act.

---

---

Issues:
Validity of re-assessment proceedings under section 147 of the Income Tax Act for assessment years 2007-08 and 2008-09.

Analysis:

1. Background: The appeals by the Revenue and cross objections by the assessee stem from orders dated 29th March 2016 by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) regarding assessment years 2007-08 and 2008-09.

2. Common Ground Raised by Revenue: The primary issue raised by the Revenue in both appeals was the quashing of re-assessment proceedings by the Commissioner (Appeals) due to the Assessing Officer's failure to properly reject the assessee's objection to the re-opening, citing legal precedents.

3. Factual Overview: The Assessing Officer re-opened the assessments after finding discrepancies in the utilization of funds raised through foreign currency convertible bonds (FCCB) by the assessee, leading to the disallowance of bond issue expenditures for both years.

4. Commissioner's Decision: The Commissioner (Appeals) held that the assessment orders were legally unsustainable as the Assessing Officer did not independently address the objections raised by the assessee against the re-opening of assessments under section 147 of the Act.

5. Arguments: The Departmental Representative argued that the non-disposal of objections was a procedural irregularity, suggesting the issue be restored to the Assessing Officer. The assessee's counsel contended that such a defect affects the jurisdiction of the Assessing Officer and cannot be rectified by a mere restoration.

6. Judicial Analysis: The Tribunal found that the Assessing Officer's failure to dispose of objections independently before completing the assessments violated due process, citing the Supreme Court's precedent in GKN Driveshafts India Ltd. The Tribunal relied on the decision in KSS Petron Pvt. Ltd., emphasizing that re-assessment orders passed without addressing objections must be quashed without a chance for fresh assessments.

7. Legal Precedents: The Tribunal distinguished the cited cases and upheld the Commissioner's decision, emphasizing the importance of addressing objections before completing assessments.

8. Final Decision: The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue's appeals and the assessee's cross objections, affirming the quashing of re-assessment orders due to the Assessing Officer's failure to address objections, thereby upholding the legal unsustainability of the assessment orders.

9. Conclusion: The Tribunal's detailed analysis highlighted the significance of due process in re-assessment proceedings and the necessity of addressing objections raised by the assessee before finalizing assessments under section 147 of the Income Tax Act.

---