TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Petitioner Must Deposit Rs. 25,00,000 in Escrow Account for Duty Dispute Resolution</h1> <h3>Overseas Warehousing Pvt. Ltd., Ludhiana Versus The Union of India and others </h3> The High Court directed the petitioner to place Rs. 25,00,000 in an escrow account pending the competent authority's determination on interest and rate ... Attachment of bank accounts of petitioner - Provisional release of goods - auction - whether the petitioner was justified in having auctioned the goods of the importer as also whether the importer was justified in not getting the goods released despite an order of provisional release? - HELD THAT:- The petitioner would put an amount of ₹ 25,00,000/- in an escrow account and on its part, the competent authority would determine the question of admissibility of interest and its rate, if any, after adjudicating the dispute with regard to recovery of duty from the petitioner after giving opportunity of hearing to the petitioner - Once the escrow account is created, the bank account of the petitioner would be de-freezed. Appeal disposed off. Issues:1. Justification of auctioning goods of the importer2. Justification of not releasing goods despite an order of provisional release3. Dispute over duty amount of Rs. 15.50 lakhs4. Claimed amount by the department of Rs. 31,66,7455. Decision on putting Rs. 25,00,000 in an escrow account1. Justification of auctioning goods of the importer:The High Court addressed the issue of whether the petitioner was justified in auctioning the goods of the importer. The learned counsel for the petitioner acknowledged that this issue needed to be decided by an appropriate authority. The petitioner expressed willingness to put the duty amount in escrow pending a decision on this matter. The Court directed the competent authority to determine the admissibility of interest and the rate after adjudicating the dispute regarding duty recovery, ensuring a final reasoned order in accordance with the law.2. Justification of not releasing goods despite an order of provisional release:The Court also considered the question of whether the importer was justified in not releasing the goods despite an order of provisional release. The petitioner's counsel highlighted that the petitioner's accounts should not be frozen for the duty amount of Rs. 15.50 lakhs. The respondents' advocate contended that the amount was higher, including interest as per the Court's earlier directions. After discussions, the Court ordered the petitioner to put Rs. 25,00,000 in an escrow account, subject to the competent authority's determination of interest admissibility and rate post-adjudication of the duty recovery dispute.3. Dispute over duty amount of Rs. 15.50 lakhs:The petitioner disputed the duty amount of Rs. 15.50 lakhs, arguing that the claimed amount of Rs. 31,66,745 by the department was excessive. The Court intervened by directing the petitioner to place Rs. 25,00,000 in an escrow account, pending the competent authority's decision on the interest and rate following a thorough adjudication of the duty recovery issue. This decision aimed to resolve the discrepancy and ensure a fair determination of the duty amount.4. Claimed amount by the department of Rs. 31,66,745:The department claimed an amount of Rs. 31,66,745, which the petitioner contested as excessive. The Court balanced the interests by instructing the petitioner to place Rs. 25,00,000 in an escrow account, awaiting the competent authority's decision on interest admissibility and rate after resolving the duty recovery dispute. This approach aimed to address the discrepancy in the claimed amount and ensure a fair resolution.5. Decision on putting Rs. 25,00,000 in an escrow account:Ultimately, the Court decided that the petitioner should put Rs. 25,00,000 in an escrow account. This decision was made to facilitate a fair determination of the duty amount, interest admissibility, and rate by the competent authority post-adjudication of the duty recovery dispute. Once the escrow account was established, the petitioner's bank account would be de-frozen, marking the resolution of the matter.In conclusion, the High Court's judgment addressed multiple issues related to the auctioning of goods, duty amounts, interest, and the release of goods, providing a detailed and structured approach to resolving the dispute between the parties involved.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
