TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Join Channel
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: (i) Whether automated teller machines were eligible for depreciation at 60% as computers or only at 15% as plant and machinery or electronic devices; (ii) Whether the assessee was entitled to deduction under section 80JJAA and whether the claim required verification of the audit report before the Assessing Officer.
Issue (i): Whether automated teller machines were eligible for depreciation at 60% as computers or only at 15% as plant and machinery or electronic devices.
Analysis: The statutory question was whether ATMs, by reason of their computerized operation, network connectivity and information-processing functions, could be treated as computers for the purpose of the higher depreciation rate. The reasoning accepted the functional integration of the computer component within the ATM system and relied on the view that such machines process data, execute transactions and cannot operate independently of computer software and server connectivity. It also preferred the line of authority under the Income-tax Act that treated ATMs as computer equipment over the sales-tax based decision relied on by the Revenue.
Conclusion: The assessee was held entitled to depreciation at 60% on ATMs.
Issue (ii): Whether the assessee was entitled to deduction under section 80JJAA and whether the claim required verification of the audit report before the Assessing Officer.
Analysis: The deduction claim was treated as covered by the earlier order in the assessee's own case on the substantive eligibility for section 80JJAA. At the same time, the Court found force in the Revenue's objection that compliance with the audit-report requirement had to be verified, and therefore directed a limited remand to the Assessing Officer for that purpose. The substantive entitlement was not disturbed, but the factual compliance aspect was sent back for verification.
Conclusion: The assessee's claim under section 80JJAA was sustained in principle, subject to verification of the audit-report requirement on remand.
Final Conclusion: The assessee succeeded on the depreciation issue, while the section 80JJAA issue was sent back only for limited verification, resulting in a mixed outcome with the Revenue's appeal not succeeding on merits.
Ratio Decidendi: An ATM that functions through integrated computer processing and network-based transaction handling is to be treated as computer equipment for the purpose of depreciation, and a beneficial employment-incentive deduction may be sustained in principle while limited statutory compliance is verified on remand.
TaxTMI 
