Tribunal decision on Revenue's appeals and Cross Objections for assessment years 2007-11 clarifies tax requirements

The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue's appeals and partially allowed the Cross Objections for the assessment years 2007-08 to 2009-10, treating the Cross Objection for 2010-11 as allowed. The decision clarified that the requirement of passing an order under section 201(1) / 201(1A) of the Act did not apply when no payments were made to stockiests. Additionally, it was ruled that the provisions of section 194J did not need to be invoked for Director's Sitting Fees.

---

---

Issues:
- Requirement of passing an order u/s 201(1) / 201(1A) of the Act when no payments made to stockiests
- Applicability of provisions of section 194J to Director's Sitting Fees

Analysis:

Issue 1: Requirement of passing an order u/s 201(1) / 201(1A) of the Act when no payments made to stockiests

The case involved 8 appeals, 4 by the Revenue and 4 Cross Objections by the assessee, concerning the requirement of passing an order under section 201(1) / 201(1A) of the Act when no payments were made to stockiests. The Revenue contended that managerial services rendered by stockiests necessitated invoking section 194J of the Act. The CIT (A) relied on the Tribunal's decision in a similar case, emphasizing the "principal to principal" relationship between the parties. The Tribunal concurred with the CIT (A) and dismissed the Revenue's appeals for all the assessment years under consideration (2007-08 to 2010-11).

Issue 2: Applicability of provisions of section 194J to Director's Sitting Fees

Regarding the applicability of section 194J to Director's Sitting Fees, the assessee made payments without TDS, leading the Assessing Officer to demand tax under section 201(1A) of the Act. The CIT (A) held that such payments constituted "fees for technical services" and attracted section 194J. However, the Tribunal, after considering the amended provisions of section 194J(1)(ba) inserted by the Finance Act, 2012, ruled that these provisions need not be invoked for Director's Sitting Fees. Citing precedents and relevant material, the Tribunal granted relief to the assessee for this issue, partially allowing the Cross Objections for the assessment years 2007-08 to 2009-10, and treating the Cross Objection for 2010-11 as allowed.

In conclusion, the Tribunal dismissed all four appeals filed by the Revenue, partially allowed the Cross Objections for the assessment years 2007-08 to 2009-10, and treated the Cross Objection for 2010-11 as allowed. The judgment was pronounced on 15th December 2014.

---