2019 (9) TMI 1309 - AT - Income Tax

Tribunal rules in favor of assessee, deletes additions made by Assessing Officer under Section 153A

Yash Bhatia Versus D.C.I.T., Central Circle, Kota.

Yash Bhatia Versus D.C.I.T., Central Circle, Kota. - TMI Issues Involved:1. Validity of additions made by the A.O. in the assessment framed U/s 153A without incriminating material.2. Addition of Rs. 3,839/- on account of difference between FDR interest disclosed and declared.3. Addition of Rs. 98,000/- on account of alleged unexplained opening cash balance.Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:1. Validity of Additions U/s 153A Without Incriminating Material:The primary issue was the validity of additions made by the Assessing Officer (A.O.) under Section 153A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, without any incriminating material found during the search. The Tribunal noted that the original assessment for the year under consideration was not pending as on the date of the search and thus was not abated. The Tribunal emphasized that under Section 153A, the A.O. is required to reassess the income of the assessee. However, in the absence of any incriminating material found or seized during the search, no additions could be made regarding income already declared by the assessee in the original return. The Tribunal relied on precedents including the judgment of the Hon’ble Jurisdictional High Court in the case of Jai Steel (India) Vs ACIT, the Delhi High Court decision in PCIT Vs Meeta Gutgutia, and the ITAT Jaipur Bench decision in Shri Banna Lal Jat Vs ACIT. It was concluded that since no incriminating material was found during the search, the addition made by the A.O. was not sustainable and was deleted.2. Addition of Rs. 3,839/- on Account of Difference in FDR Interest:The Tribunal examined the addition of Rs. 3,839/- made by the A.O. due to a difference between the FDR interest disclosed in the statement of affairs and the amount declared in the return filed under Section 153A. The assessee explained that the interest was declared as per Form No. 16A issued by the bank and that the difference arose due to a calculation mistake while preparing the statement of affairs. The Tribunal found that the overall interest income offered by the assessee was more than the actual interest on FDR, indicating no suppression of income. Consequently, the Tribunal deleted the addition, noting it was due to a mere calculation error.3. Addition of Rs. 98,000/- on Account of Unexplained Opening Cash Balance:Regarding the addition of Rs. 98,000/- for an alleged unexplained opening cash balance, the Tribunal referred to the cash book submitted by the assessee, which showed no opening cash balance as on 01/04/2009. The Tribunal found the A.O.'s addition to be contrary to the facts and records. Therefore, the Tribunal deleted this addition as well.Conclusion:The Tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee, deleting all the additions made by the A.O. The Tribunal reiterated that in the absence of any incriminating material found during the search, no additions could be made under Section 153A for the completed assessments. The order was pronounced in the open court on 27th September 2019.