TaxTMI Login
AI OCR ✕Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Just a moment...
AI OCR ✕Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the entries in the books of account and the deeds of partnership constituted a disruption of the joint family business and brought into existence a partnership firm entitled to registration under Section 26A of the Income-tax Act, 1922, and whether the income-tax authorities were justified in holding otherwise.
Analysis: The books of account showed a division of the business assets and the crediting of shares to the family members, which was sufficient in law for partition of a going business without any physical division of the assets. No registered instrument was necessary for such an arrangement. The reasons relied upon by the appellate authorities, including absence of formal transfer documents, alleged defects in assignment of debts and securities, bank dealings, and lack of notice to creditors, did not furnish adequate material to deny the reality of the partition or the constitution of the firm. The statutory position under the Income-tax Act, 1922 and the settled principle that members of a Hindu undivided family may enter into a partnership in respect of divided joint property supported the assessee's case.
Conclusion: The entries and partnership deeds constituted sufficient material in law to establish disruption of the joint family business and formation of a valid partnership firm. The firm was entitled to registration under Section 26A of the Income-tax Act, 1922, and the contrary view of the income-tax authorities was not sustainable.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
