Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the petitioners were entitled to benefit under the Served From India Scheme for licences issued under the Foreign Trade Policy 2004-2009, and whether the respondents could refuse or recall those benefits.
Analysis: The relevant policy provision under the Foreign Trade Policy 2004-2009 applied to "all service providers" meeting the eligibility criteria. That expression was held not to exclude Indian companies merely because they were subsidiaries of foreign entities. The earlier writ decision had already held that the petitioners' claim under the 2004-2009 Policy had been wrongly rejected without considering the relevant policy. Since the controversy concerning the 2009-2014 Policy did not govern the present claim, and there was no counter-affidavit or effective dispute on entitlement, the petitioners' right to the restored benefit stood established. However, the request for refund of customs duty already paid was declined, and the appropriate relief was reissuance of transferable duty free scrips of equivalent value.
Conclusion: The petitioners were entitled to the Served From India Scheme benefit under the Foreign Trade Policy 2004-2009, and the respondents were directed to reissue equivalent duty free scrips; the refund claim was rejected.