Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:
TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        <h1>High Court rules taxes not deductible from reserve for capital computation under Business Profits Tax Act</h1> The High Court ruled in favor of the assessee-company, stating that taxes paid should not be deducted from the taxation reserve account for capital ... - Issues Involved:1. Permissibility of deducting taxes paid from the taxation reserve account for computing capital under the Business Profits Tax Act.2. Classification and treatment of advance tax payments in the context of reserves.3. System of accounting and its impact on the treatment of tax payments and reserves.Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:1. Permissibility of Deducting Taxes Paid from the Taxation Reserve Account:The core issue is whether the Income Tax department can deduct taxes paid from the taxation reserve account when computing the capital of the assessee-company under the Business Profits Tax Act. The assessee-company maintained a 'taxation reserve account' funded by profit appropriations and a 'taxes paid account' for taxes paid from available funds. The Income Tax Officer set off the taxes paid against the balances in the 'taxation reserve account,' resulting in a net figure for capital computation. The Appellate Assistant Commissioner upheld this decision, emphasizing that the reserve should reflect only the net figure after tax payments. However, the Tribunal disagreed, stating that the taxation reserve was built from past profits and should be treated as a general reserve. The Tribunal concluded that payments from the 'taxes paid account' should not deplete the 'taxation reserve account,' as the reserve was not specifically earmarked for tax payments. The High Court upheld the Tribunal's view, stating that the system of accounting adopted by the assessee-company was justified and consistent with accounting principles. The court ruled that the amounts paid from the 'taxes paid account' should not be deducted from the 'taxation reserve account' for capital computation.2. Classification and Treatment of Advance Tax Payments:The assessee-company argued that advance tax payments should not be deducted from the taxation reserve. The Tribunal accepted this contention, noting that advance tax payments were made from unappropriated funds and not from the reserve. The High Court agreed, emphasizing that advance tax payments under section 18A of the Income Tax Act were made under statutory compulsion and did not constitute part of the reserve. The court cited accounting principles and previous case law to support its view that advance tax payments should be treated as payments on account and should not deplete the reserve. The court concluded that advance tax payments should not be deducted from the 'taxation reserve account' for capital computation.3. System of Accounting and Its Impact on the Treatment of Tax Payments and Reserves:The court examined the system of accounting adopted by the assessee-company, which treated advance tax payments as advances until assessments were finalized. The court found this system justified, as it allowed for accurate accounting of tax liabilities. The court noted that the assessee-company maintained separate accounts for advance tax payments and the taxation reserve, and that the reserve was intended to meet tax liabilities after final assessments. The court concluded that the system of accounting adopted by the assessee-company was consistent with accounting principles and should be respected by the Income Tax department.Conclusion:The High Court ruled in favor of the assessee-company, stating that the amounts paid from the 'taxes paid account' should not be deducted from the 'taxation reserve account' for capital computation. The court emphasized that advance tax payments should not deplete the reserve and upheld the system of accounting adopted by the assessee-company. The court's answers to the reframed questions were as follows:1. Question No. 1: In the negative.2. Question No. 2: In the affirmative.3. Question No. 3: Not pressed and therefore not answered.The Commissioner was ordered to pay the costs of the reference to the assessee-company.

        Topics

        ActsIncome Tax
        No Records Found