Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:
TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        <h1>Invalid Reassessment Proceedings Annulled for Income Tax Act Violation</h1> The Tribunal annulled the reassessment proceedings for the assessment years 1959-60, 1961-62, and 1962-63, initiated under section 147(a) of the ... Disclose Materials Necessary For Assessment, Reassessment, Reference Issues Involved:1. Validity of reassessment proceedings under section 147(a) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, for the assessment years 1959-60, 1961-62, and 1962-63.Detailed Analysis:Issue 1: Validity of Reassessment Proceedings for Assessment Year 1959-60The Tribunal annulled the reassessment proceedings initiated under section 147(a) for the assessment year 1959-60. During the original assessment, the assessee had filed the return of income along with balance sheets and profit and loss accounts. The Income-tax Officer (ITO) had scrutinized these documents and noted the unsecured loans from creditors. The ITO had issued a questionnaire to the assessee for further details, which were presumably provided as there was no grievance recorded by the ITO in the original assessment order.In 1968, the ITO reopened the assessment, citing that the assessee had introduced concealed income amounting to Rs. 2,00,000 in the names of unverifiable hundi creditors. The Tribunal found that the necessary particulars had been supplied during the original assessment and that the ITO's reasons for reopening the assessment were not based on any concrete materials but rather on suspicion. The Tribunal relied on the Supreme Court decision in Sheo Nath Singh [1971] 82 ITR 147, emphasizing that the belief to reopen must be based on reasonable grounds, not on suspicion or caprice. The Tribunal concluded that the reassessment proceedings were not validly initiated as the ITO's reasons failed to meet the requirements of section 147(a).Issue 2: Validity of Reassessment Proceedings for Assessment Year 1961-62For the assessment year 1961-62, the reassessment proceedings were similarly annulled by the Tribunal. The ITO had reopened the assessment on identical grounds as those for the year 1959-60, adding Rs. 1,25,000 to the income. The Tribunal observed that during the original assessment, confirmatory letters and income-tax file numbers of the hundi creditors had been provided. The Tribunal found that the circumstances were similar to those of the previous year and annulled the reassessment for the same reasons.Issue 3: Validity of Reassessment Proceedings for Assessment Year 1962-63For the assessment year 1962-63, the Tribunal noted that the assessee had provided copies of accounts, addresses, and confirmatory letters of the creditors during the original assessment. The ITO reopened the assessment on similar grounds, adding Rs. 5,95,000 based on the peak credit method. The Tribunal found that there was no new material or confession indicating that the creditors were bogus. The Tribunal held that the reassessment proceedings were not validly initiated as the ITO's reasons did not have a rational nexus to the belief that income had escaped assessment.Conclusion:The Tribunal concluded that the reassessments for the assessment years 1959-60, 1961-62, and 1962-63 were not validly initiated under section 147(a) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The Tribunal emphasized that for a valid reopening, there must be concrete materials existing before reopening, which have a rational nexus to the formation of the belief by the ITO. The Tribunal found that there were no such materials in these cases, and thus, the reassessments were annulled. The High Court upheld the Tribunal's findings, agreeing that the reassessments were not justified in law.

        Topics

        ActsIncome Tax
        No Records Found