Just a moment...

Top
FeedbackReport
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Feedback/Report an Error
Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:
TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
By Case ID:

When case Id is present, search is done only for this

Sort By: ?
Even if Sort by Date is selected, exact match will be shown on the top.
RelevanceDate
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        Note

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        <h1>Tribunal rules in favor of assessee on deductions under section 80IA for scrap sales and recoveries</h1> <h3>The A.C.I.T., Circle Shimla Versus M/s Satluj Jal Vidyut Nigam Ltd. And SJVN Ltd. And Vice Versa.</h3> The A.C.I.T., Circle Shimla Versus M/s Satluj Jal Vidyut Nigam Ltd. And SJVN Ltd. And Vice Versa. - TMI Issues Involved:1. Disallowance of CSR expenses.2. Taxability of interest on income tax refund.3. Income set off against expenditure during construction period.4. Computation of deduction under section 80IA.5. Addition to book profit under section 115JB.6. Deduction under section 80IA on scrap sales.7. Deduction under section 80IA on sundry creditors written back and insurance claim received.8. Deduction under section 80IA on recovery from JP Power Ventures and Karcham Wangtoo.Detailed Analysis:1. Disallowance of CSR Expenses:The assessee incurred CSR expenses of Rs. 16,03,01,431/-, which were disallowed by the A.O. and upheld by the CIT(A) on the grounds that Explanation 2 to Section 37, disallowing CSR expenses, was retrospective. The Tribunal, however, referred to decisions in National Seeds Corporation Ltd. and Jindal Power Limited, holding that CSR expenses are business expenses and Explanation 2 is prospective. Thus, the disallowance was deleted, and the ground was allowed.2. Taxability of Interest on Income Tax Refund:The assessee received Rs. 2,16,05,340/- as interest on an income tax refund, which was not offered for taxation. The A.O. added this amount to the income, which was upheld by the CIT(A) as the applicable CERC regulation did not consider tax a pass-through item. The Tribunal found no merit in the assessee's contention and upheld the addition.3. Income Set Off Against Expenditure During Construction Period:Grounds related to income set off against expenditure during the construction period were not pressed by the assessee and were dismissed as not pressed.4. Computation of Deduction under Section 80IA:a) Interest from Staff: Not pressed and dismissed.b) Miscellaneous Income: The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s decision that income from scrap sales is eligible for deduction under section 80IA as it is directly linked to the manufacturing process.5. Addition to Book Profit under Section 115JB:The A.O. added interest on income tax refund to the book profit, assuming it was not included. The Tribunal found that the interest was included in the profit and loss account and directed deletion of the addition, allowing the ground.6. Deduction under Section 80IA on Scrap Sales:The A.O. denied deduction on scrap sales, but the CIT(A) allowed it, finding that the scrap was generated from the manufacturing process. The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s decision, noting that the scrap sales reduced the cost of new spares, thus increasing manufacturing profits.7. Deduction under Section 80IA on Sundry Creditors Written Back and Insurance Claim Received:The CIT(A) disallowed the deduction, stating the assessee failed to establish the receipts were related to business transactions. The Tribunal restored the issue to the A.O. for verification, following the direction given in the assessee's case for A.Y. 2008-09.8. Deduction under Section 80IA on Recovery from JP Power Ventures and Karcham Wangtoo:The A.O. denied the deduction, but the CIT(A) allowed it, finding the recoveries were related to business undertakings. The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s decision, noting the recoveries were directly related to the running of the projects/plants.Conclusion:The Tribunal allowed the assessee's appeal partly, dismissing some grounds as not pressed and upholding the CIT(A)'s decisions on others. The Revenue's appeal was dismissed, affirming the CIT(A)'s allowance of deductions under section 80IA for scrap sales and recoveries from JP Power Ventures and Karcham Wangtoo.

        Topics

        ActsIncome Tax
        No Records Found