Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Don't have an account? Register Here
<h1>Court rules in favor of assessee on applying law for assessment year</h1> The court ruled in favor of the assessee, emphasizing the importance of applying the law in force during the assessment year unless expressly stated ... Actual Cost, Assessment, Business Expenditure, Depreciation, Developement Rebate Issues involved:The judgment addresses various questions of law related to expenses incurred on foreign tours, admissibility of depreciation and development rebate, deduction of expenditure on organizing football tournaments, and applicability of section 40(c)(iii) as per the Finance Act, 1964.Expenses on Foreign Tours:The judgment discusses whether expenses incurred on foreign tours represent an element of actual cost of machinery and plant, making depreciation and development rebate admissible. It specifically examines expenses related to Shri Charat Ram, technical officers, directors, and Lala Charat Ram.Expenditure on Organizing Football Tournaments:The court deliberates on whether the expenditure incurred by the assessee in organizing football tournaments qualifies as an allowable deduction under section 37 of the Income-tax Act, 1961.Applicability of Section 40(c)(iii) - Finance Act, 1964:The judgment analyzes whether the provisions of section 40(c)(iii) as amended by the Finance Act, 1964, were correctly applied in disallowing a specific sum by the Income-tax Officer, and whether the law applicable to an assessment is the one in force in the assessment year unless otherwise provided expressly or by necessary implication.The court emphasizes that the law to be applied is that in force in the assessment year unless expressly or implicitly stated otherwise. It clarifies that the provisions of the Finance Act, 1963, and the Finance Act, 1964, are crucial in determining the deductibility of certain expenditures. The judgment highlights the importance of understanding the legislative intent behind tax laws and the significance of specific provisions in computing taxable income. Ultimately, the reference is answered against the Revenue and in favor of the assessee, with no order as to costs.