Synchronized circular trades and artificial volume can breach PFUTP norms; delay or broker-client labels do not negate liability.

Repeated buy and sell orders matched within seconds, rotated shares within a closed group, and created artificial volume without any real change in beneficial ownership; the note treats this pattern as synchronized circular trading contrary to PFUTP norms and the stock-broker code of conduct. It also records that supplying the documents referred to in the show-cause notice was sufficient, and no prejudice arose from non-disclosure of the full investigation report or from not examining the client. Prolonged delay in concluding proceedings was described as undesirable, but not by itself a ground to erase liability where misconduct was established. A mere broker-client label and low turnover did not negate participation in the trading pattern.

---

---

Issues: (i) Whether the trades executed by the broker on behalf of its client in the scrip were synchronized circular trades creating artificial volume and violating the PFUTP Regulations and the stock-broker code of conduct; (ii) whether the order was vitiated for breach of natural justice for non-furnishing of the entire investigation report and non-examination of the client; (iii) whether the prolonged delay in passing the final order warranted setting aside the penalty; and (iv) whether the broker could escape liability on the plea of a mere broker-client relationship and insignificant turnover.

Issue (i): Whether the trades executed by the broker on behalf of its client in the scrip were synchronized circular trades creating artificial volume and violating the PFUTP Regulations and the stock-broker code of conduct.

Analysis: The trading pattern showed repeated matching of buy and sell orders within seconds, rotation of shares within a closed group, and no real change in beneficial ownership. The trades were executed in a circular manner over several days, generating artificial volume and giving a false impression of active market trading. The pattern was found to be deliberate and not coincidental.

Conclusion: The issue was decided against the appellant. The trades were held to be synchronized circular trades in violation of the applicable regulations and code of conduct.

Issue (ii): Whether the order was vitiated for breach of natural justice for non-furnishing of the entire investigation report and non-examination of the client.

Analysis: The documents relied upon in the show-cause notice had been supplied. No prejudice was shown from the non-furnishing of the entire investigation report. Since the trades on record themselves established synchronized circular dealing, examination of the client would not have displaced the findings based on the trading data.

Conclusion: The issue was decided against the appellant. No breach of natural justice was found.

Issue (iii): Whether the prolonged delay in passing the final order warranted setting aside the penalty.

Analysis: The proceedings had remained pending for nearly twelve years, which was described as highly deplorable and avoidable. However, delay by itself was held not to absolve a person found guilty of violating market regulations, particularly where the merits established misconduct.

Conclusion: The issue was decided against the appellant. The delay did not justify quashing the impugned order.

Issue (iv): Whether the broker could escape liability on the plea of a mere broker-client relationship and insignificant turnover.

Analysis: The record showed repeated synchronized trades within a group and active participation of the broker in the circular pattern. Liability did not depend on the size of the broker's overall turnover, and a mere broker-client label did not negate the inference of acting in tandem with others.

Conclusion: The issue was decided against the appellant. The plea of mere broker-client relationship and miniscule turnover failed.

Final Conclusion: The impugned order was sustained in full and the appeal was dismissed, with no interference granted on merits or on the plea of delay.

---