2012 (10) TMI 1216 - HC - Income Tax

Court allows pro-rata deduction for mixed-use housing project under Section 80IB(10)

Commissioner of Income-tax, Chennai Versus Arun Excello Foundations (P.) Ltd.

Commissioner of Income-tax, Chennai Versus Arun Excello Foundations (P.) Ltd. - TMI Issues Involved:1. Eligibility for deduction under Section 80IB(10) on a pro-rata basis for housing projects with both commercial and residential units.2. Applicability and interpretation of Section 80IB(10) before and after the amendment effective from 01.04.2005.3. Definition and scope of the term 'housing project' under Section 80IB(10).4. Impact of the conversion of residential units to commercial use on the eligibility for deduction.5. Proportionate relief on partial compliance with Section 80IB(10).Detailed Analysis:1. Eligibility for Deduction under Section 80IB(10) on a Pro-rata Basis:The core issue was whether the Tribunal was correct in holding that deduction under Section 80IB(10) is allowable on a pro-rata basis for projects with both commercial and residential units. The Tribunal allowed the deduction on a pro-rata basis, stating that the residential units complied with the conditions stipulated in Section 80IB(10), while the commercial area did not exceed the permissible limit.2. Applicability and Interpretation of Section 80IB(10) Before and After the Amendment Effective from 01.04.2005:The Tribunal and the High Court noted that the amendment to Section 80IB(10) effective from 01.04.2005, which introduced sub-clause (d) restricting the built-up area for commercial usage, was prospective and not retrospective. Therefore, for the assessment years 2003-04 and 2004-05, the provisions as they stood before the amendment applied, and there was no restriction on the commercial area in a housing project.3. Definition and Scope of the Term 'Housing Project' under Section 80IB(10):The High Court referred to the definition of 'housing project' under Section 80HHBA, which includes the construction of any building, road, bridge, or other structure. It held that the term 'housing project' under Section 80IB(10) should be understood in a broader sense to include both residential and commercial buildings. The Court emphasized that the absence of a specific definition in Section 80IB(10) should not restrict the term to residential units alone.4. Impact of the Conversion of Residential Units to Commercial Use on the Eligibility for Deduction:The Revenue argued that the conversion of residential units to commercial use by the purchasers should disqualify the project from deduction. However, the Court held that what the purchasers did with the units post-purchase was irrelevant to the assessee's claim for deduction. The assessee had sold the units as residential, and the conversion by purchasers did not affect the eligibility for deduction.5. Proportionate Relief on Partial Compliance with Section 80IB(10):The Court upheld the Tribunal's decision to grant deduction on a pro-rata basis. It stated that in cases where the housing project included both compliant and non-compliant units, the deduction should be allowed proportionately for the compliant units. The Court referred to the decision in CIT v. Brahma Associates, which supported the view that a project approved with permissible commercial use should not be denied deduction under Section 80IB(10).Conclusion:The High Court dismissed the Revenue's appeal, confirming the Tribunal's order that allowed deduction under Section 80IB(10) on a pro-rata basis for the residential units in the housing project. The Court emphasized a broad interpretation of 'housing project' to include commercial areas and held that the post-purchase conversion of units did not affect the eligibility for deduction. The decision reinforced the principle of granting proportionate relief for partial compliance with the conditions under Section 80IB(10).