Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:
TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
By Case ID:

When case Id is present, search is done only for this

Sort By:
RelevanceDefaultDate
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        <h1>Tribunal rules in favor of assessee, no tax on payment to foreign company</h1> <h3>Shivsu Canadian Clear Waters Ltd. Versus Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Corporate Circle - 6 (1), Chennai</h3> Shivsu Canadian Clear Waters Ltd. Versus Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Corporate Circle - 6 (1), Chennai - TMI Issues Involved:1. Disallowance of Rs. 5,25,00,000 paid to a foreign company without deducting tax under Section 195 of the Income-tax Act, 1961.2. Validity of reopening the assessment under Section 147 of the Income-tax Act, 1961.Detailed Analysis:Issue 1: Disallowance of Rs. 5,25,00,000 paid to a foreign company without deducting tax under Section 195 of the Income-tax Act, 1961The assessee contended that the payment of Rs. 5,25,00,000 to Canadian Crystalline Emirates, UAE, was for erection and commissioning charges, not for technical services. The profit earned by the foreign company was not taxable in India, and thus, the assessee was not liable to deduct tax under Section 195 of the Act. The assessee argued that the design and machinery belonged to them, and the foreign company was merely erecting the machinery, which amounted to construction, not technical service.On the contrary, the Departmental Representative argued that the payment to the non-resident company required deduction of tax at source as it was in the nature of fees for technical services. The non-resident company utilized its technical skill and expertise, making the profit taxable in India. The Department relied on the retrospective amendment to Section 9(1)(vii) of the Act, which deemed the income of the non-resident company to accrue in India.The Tribunal examined the agreements and found that the machinery and equipment were purchased and supplied outside India, and the installation services were also rendered outside India. According to Explanation 2 to Section 9(1)(vii) of the Act, consideration for construction, assembly, or like projects is not deemed to be fees for technical services. The Tribunal concluded that the services rendered by the foreign company did not constitute technical services and, therefore, did not require tax deduction under Section 195. Consequently, no income had escaped taxation.Issue 2: Validity of reopening the assessment under Section 147 of the Income-tax Act, 1961The assessee challenged the reopening of the assessment, arguing that no fresh material came to the possession of the Assessing Officer, and the conditions for reopening under Section 147 were not met. The assessee relied on the judgment of the Madras High Court in Tanmac India v. Dy. CIT, where it was held that reopening of assessment was invalid in the absence of new or tangible material.The Departmental Representative argued that the Assessing Officer had reason to believe that income chargeable to tax had escaped assessment, justifying the issuance of notice under Section 148. The payment made to the non-resident company without deducting tax at source led to the escapement of income from taxation.The Tribunal referred to the Madras High Court judgment in Tanmac India, where it was held that reassessment proceedings based solely on the original return and enclosures, without new or tangible material, were invalid. In the present case, the original assessment under Section 143(3) was completed after scrutinizing the entire material, and no new material came to the possession of the Assessing Officer subsequently. Therefore, the Tribunal found the reopening of the assessment invalid in the absence of any new or tangible material.Conclusion:The Tribunal set aside the orders of the lower authorities, deleted the addition made by the Assessing Officer, and allowed the appeal filed by the assessee. The payment to the foreign company was not considered fees for technical services, and the reopening of the assessment was deemed invalid due to the absence of new or tangible material.

        Topics

        ActsIncome Tax
        No Records Found