Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the Indian Limitation Act applies to a dispute referred for decision under Section 54 of the Bombay Co-operative Societies Act, 1925, and whether failure to apply limitation furnished a ground to interfere with the award under Section 54-A.
Analysis: The arbitration under Section 54 was a statutory arbitration, not a contractual reference. Section 3 of the Indian Limitation Act does not in terms extend to arbitration proceedings, and though Section 37 of the Indian Arbitration Act, 1940 makes the Limitation Act applicable to arbitrations as proceedings in court, Section 46 expressly excludes statutory arbitrations from that extension. The principles governing contractual arbitrations, where an implied term may require the arbitrator to decide according to the existing law and to entertain a limitation defence, could not be imported into a reference created by statute. Rule 35, which requires the award to be made in accordance with justice, equity and good conscience, did not compel a different result where the statute itself excluded the application of Section 37.
Conclusion: The Indian Limitation Act did not apply to the statutory arbitration under Section 54, and the award could not be interfered with on the ground that limitation was not applied.